On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 03:09:51PM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
>
>
> On 1/20/24 14:49, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 02:13:14PM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
> > > Thanks for your reply.
> > >
> > > On 1/20/24 09:34, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at
On 1/20/24 14:49, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 02:13:14PM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
On 1/20/24 09:34, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 01:26:57AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
Hi, Charlie
Although this patchset has been merged I still
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 02:13:14PM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On 1/20/24 09:34, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 01:26:57AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
> > > Hi, Charlie
> > >
> > > Although this patchset has been merged I still have some questions
Thanks for your reply.
On 1/20/24 09:34, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 01:26:57AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
Hi, Charlie
Although this patchset has been merged I still have some questions about
this patchset. Because it breaks regular mmap if address >= 38 bits on
sv48 / sv57
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 01:26:57AM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
> Hi, Charlie
>
> Although this patchset has been merged I still have some questions about
> this patchset. Because it breaks regular mmap if address >= 38 bits on
> sv48 / sv57 capable systems like qemu. For example, If a userspace
Hi, Charlie
Although this patchset has been merged I still have some questions about
this patchset. Because it breaks regular mmap if address >= 38 bits on
sv48 / sv57 capable systems like qemu. For example, If a userspace program
wants to mmap an anonymous page to addr=(1<<45) on an sv48 capable
