On 12/8/23 14:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
So as David already argued, the current thing does not in fact help with
b. You just have to install once and the error goes away, then carry
that tree for a year and you're running old crap again.
My biggest beef with the whole thing is that I simply do n
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 12:29:37PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion about how this should be done, and in
> fact I believed at the time that I was bringing the system into
> compliance with what everyone wanted here. :)
>
> There seem to be two conflicting visions:
>
>
On 12/8/23 07:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 08.12.23 16:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:22:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.11.23 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama
On 08.12.23 16:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:22:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.11.23 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama Anjum [1], the following is how
one is supp
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:22:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 03.11.23 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> > > As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama Anjum [1], the following is how
> > > one is supposed to build selftests:
> >
Hi John, Muhammad,
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023, John Hubbard wrote:
> As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama Anjum [1], the following is how
> one is supposed to build selftests:
>
> make headers && make -C tools/testing/selftests/mm
>
> Change the selftest build system's lib.mk to fail out with a
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:59:28PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Okay. the question is if your workflow can be easily adjusted, or if we can
> improve that header handling as a whole.
So on IRC the following was suggested:
make O=defconfig-build headers ; make O=defconfig-build -C
tools/t
On 03.11.23 13:46, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:22:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.11.23 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama Anjum [1], the following is how
one is supp
On 03.11.23 13:59, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.11.23 13:46, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:22:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.11.23 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
As per a discussion with Muhammad Usam
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:22:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 03.11.23 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> > > As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama Anjum [1], the following is how
> > > one is supposed to build selftests:
> >
On 03.11.23 13:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama Anjum [1], the following is how
one is supposed to build selftests:
make headers && make -C tools/testing/selftests/mm
Change the selftest build s
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:16:37AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> As per a discussion with Muhammad Usama Anjum [1], the following is how
> one is supposed to build selftests:
>
> make headers && make -C tools/testing/selftests/mm
>
> Change the selftest build system's lib.mk to fail out with a
12 matches
Mail list logo
