On Mon, 2023-12-18 at 13:47 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/15/23 13:36, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> > On 12/11/23 16:53, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdeso...@suse
On 12/15/23 13:36, Joe Lawrence wrote:
On 12/11/23 16:53, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdeso...@suse.com wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +, Shuah Khan wrote:
0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-liv
On 12/11/23 16:53, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdeso...@suse.com wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>
0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavil
On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdeso...@suse.com wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +, Shuah Khan wrote:
0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
style problems, please review.
NOTE: If an
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdeso...@suse.com wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> > 0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
> > style problems, please review.
> >
> > NOTE: If any of the errors are fa
On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdeso...@suse.com wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +, Shuah Khan wrote:
0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/1/23 06:13, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:24:26PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Missing module name? Is there a reason to not name this module?
> >
> > Can you please elaborate? This new module us
On 12/1/23 06:13, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:24:26PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
Missing module name? Is there a reason to not name this module?
Can you please elaborate? This new module use the same MODULE_ macros used by
the current livepatch selftests. What do y
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:24:26PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/31/23 15:10, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> > The test proves that a syscall can be livepatched. It is interesting
> > because syscalls are called a tricky way. Also the process gets
> > livepatched either when sleeping in the user
On 10/31/23 15:10, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
The test proves that a syscall can be livepatched. It is interesting
because syscalls are called a tricky way. Also the process gets
livepatched either when sleeping in the userspace or when entering
or leaving the kernel space.
The livepatch is a
The test proves that a syscall can be livepatched. It is interesting
because syscalls are called a tricky way. Also the process gets
livepatched either when sleeping in the userspace or when entering
or leaving the kernel space.
The livepatch is a bit tricky:
1. The syscall function name is arch
11 matches
Mail list logo
