Test a more realistic usage pattern, and one with heavy contention, in order to
actually exercise ntsync's internal synchronization.

This test has several threads in a tight loop acquiring a mutex, modifying some
shared data, and then releasing the mutex. At the end we check if the data is
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfig...@codeweavers.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
index 968874d7e325..5fa2c9a0768c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
@@ -1330,4 +1330,78 @@ TEST(alert_all)
        close(fd);
 }
 
+#define STRESS_LOOPS 10000
+#define STRESS_THREADS 4
+
+static unsigned int stress_counter;
+static int stress_device, stress_start_event, stress_mutex;
+
+static void *stress_thread(void *arg)
+{
+       struct ntsync_wait_args wait_args = {0};
+       __u32 index, count, i;
+       int ret;
+
+       wait_args.timeout = UINT64_MAX;
+       wait_args.count = 1;
+       wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)&stress_start_event;
+       wait_args.owner = gettid();
+       wait_args.index = 0xdeadbeef;
+
+       ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY, &wait_args);
+
+       wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)&stress_mutex;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < STRESS_LOOPS; ++i) {
+               ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY, &wait_args);
+
+               ++stress_counter;
+
+               unlock_mutex(stress_mutex, wait_args.owner, &count);
+       }
+
+       return NULL;
+}
+
+TEST(stress_wait)
+{
+       struct ntsync_event_args event_args;
+       struct ntsync_mutex_args mutex_args;
+       pthread_t threads[STRESS_THREADS];
+       __u32 signaled, i;
+       int ret;
+
+       stress_device = open("/dev/ntsync", O_CLOEXEC | O_RDONLY);
+       ASSERT_LE(0, stress_device);
+
+       mutex_args.owner = 0;
+       mutex_args.count = 0;
+       ret = ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX, &mutex_args);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       stress_mutex = mutex_args.mutex;
+
+       event_args.manual = 1;
+       event_args.signaled = 0;
+       ret = ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT, &event_args);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       stress_start_event = event_args.event;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < STRESS_THREADS; ++i)
+               pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, stress_thread, NULL);
+
+       ret = ioctl(stress_start_event, NTSYNC_IOC_EVENT_SET, &signaled);
+       EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+       for (i = 0; i < STRESS_THREADS; ++i) {
+               ret = pthread_join(threads[i], NULL);
+               EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+       }
+
+       EXPECT_EQ(STRESS_LOOPS * STRESS_THREADS, stress_counter);
+
+       close(stress_start_event);
+       close(stress_mutex);
+       close(stress_device);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to