On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 06:26:58PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:15:16AM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > The DT is improperly
> > formatted since it has heterogeneous vlenb entries and has V enabled,
> > but since the user disabled V in the kernel skipping the warning
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:15:16AM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> The DT is improperly
> formatted since it has heterogeneous vlenb entries and has V enabled,
> but since the user disabled V in the kernel skipping the warning is
> reasonable.
I wouldn't go as far as "improperly formatted", as if
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 05:59:33PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > If vlenb is provided in the device tree, prefer that over reading the
> > vlenb csr.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins
> > ---
> >
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> If vlenb is provided in the device tree, prefer that over reading the
> vlenb csr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 43
>
If vlenb is provided in the device tree, prefer that over reading the
vlenb csr.
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 43 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c | 12 ++-
