Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests/timers/posix_timers: Test delivery of signals across threads

2024-04-06 Thread Muhammad Usama Anjum
On 4/7/24 2:13 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Muhammad, > > I am sorry, but... are you aware that this patch was applied over a year ago, > and then this code was updated to use the ksft_API? Sorry, didn't realized this is already applied. So this patch is already applied and it has already been made

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests/timers/posix_timers: Test delivery of signals across threads

2024-04-06 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Muhammad, I am sorry, but... are you aware that this patch was applied over a year ago, and then this code was updated to use the ksft_API? Oleg. On 04/07, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote: > > On 3/16/23 5:30 PM, Marco Elver wrote: > > From: Dmitry Vyukov > > > > Test that POSIX timers using CLOCK_

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests/timers/posix_timers: Test delivery of signals across threads

2024-04-06 Thread Muhammad Usama Anjum
On 3/16/23 5:30 PM, Marco Elver wrote: > From: Dmitry Vyukov > > Test that POSIX timers using CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID eventually deliver > a signal to all running threads. This effectively tests that the kernel > doesn't prefer any one thread (or subset of threads) for signal delivery. > > Sig