On 11/23/23 16:14, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 01:09:42PM +0100, Laura Nao wrote:
>>> Your talk was interesting at Linux Plumbers.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE73eVSyFXQ [time +2:35]
>>>
>>> This is probably a stupid question, but why not just add something to
>>> ca
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 01:09:42PM +0100, Laura Nao wrote:
> > Your talk was interesting at Linux Plumbers.
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE73eVSyFXQ [time +2:35]
> >
> > This is probably a stupid question, but why not just add something to
> > call_driver_probe() which creates a sysfs
> Your talk was interesting at Linux Plumbers.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE73eVSyFXQ [time +2:35]
>
> This is probably a stupid question, but why not just add something to
> call_driver_probe() which creates a sysfs directory tree with all the
> driver information?
>
Thanks for the fe
Your talk was interesting at Linux Plumbers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE73eVSyFXQ [time +2:35]
This is probably a stupid question, but why not just add something to
call_driver_probe() which creates a sysfs directory tree with all the
driver information?
regards,
dan carpenter
Gentle ping to check if there are any feedback or comments on this series.
Thanks,
Laura
Regressions that prevent a driver from probing a device can significantly
affect the functionality of a platform.
A kselftest to verify if devices on a DT-based platform are probed
correctly was recently introduced [1], but no such generic test is
available for ACPI platforms yet. bootrr [2] prov
