Re: [linux-lvm] Shared VG, Separate LVs

Sure. Will keep that in mind. Thanks a lot, Eric. Regards, Indivar Nair On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Eric Ren wrote: > Hi, > > > > > *"I noticed you didn't configure LVM resource agent to manage your VG's > (de)activation task, not sure if it can always work as expect, so

Re: [linux-lvm] Shared VG, Separate LVs

Hi, /"I noticed you didn't configure LVM resource agent to manage your VG's (de)activation task, not sure if it can always work as expect, so have more exceptional checking :)" /              Strangely the Pacemaker active-passive configuration example shows VG controlled by Pacemaker,