On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
> > I've tested your patch and it works very well. Thanks very much.
>
> Could you please consider to push this patch upstream?
OK
> Also, Is this the same case for pvmove as lvresize? If so, can we also
> work out a similar patch for pv
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:15:24AM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Regarding the question of the subject, I can think of three main benefits of
> lvmlockd over clvmd:
>
> - lvmlockd supports two cluster locking plugins: dlm and sanlock. sanlock
> plugin can supports up to ~2000 nodes
> tha
Hi David,
On 01/09/2018 11:42 PM, David Teigland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:42:27AM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
I've tested your patch and it works very well. Thanks very much.
Could you please consider to push this patch upstream?
OK
Thanks very much! So, can we update the `man 8 lvmlo
Hi David,
Thanks for your explanations!
On 01/10/2018 12:06 AM, David Teigland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:15:24AM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
Hi David,
Regarding the question of the subject, I can think of three main benefits of
lvmlockd over clvmd:
- lvmlockd supports two cluster locking