Re: [linux-lvm] Issue after upgrading the LVM2 package from 2.02.176 to 2.02.180

2020-09-14 Thread KrishnaMurali Chennuboina
Hi Roger, I have tried this with the older LVM package(.176) and this issue was not seen. Issue was seen with .180 version every time. # executing command: vgchange -ay (status, output): (0, WARNING: Failed to connect to lvmetad. Falling back to device scanning.) WARNING: Failed to connect to

[linux-lvm] lvmcache with vdo - inconsistent block size

2020-09-14 Thread Gionatan Danti
Hi all, I am testing lvmcache with VDO and I have issue with devices block size. The big & slow VDO device is on top of a 4-disk MD RAID 10 device (itself on top of dm-integrity). Over the VDO device I created a thinpool and a thinvol [1]. When adding the cache device to the volume group via v

Re: [linux-lvm] Issue after upgrading the LVM2 package from 2.02.176 to 2.02.180

2020-09-14 Thread Roger Heflin
In general I would suggest fully disabling lvmetad from the config files and from being started up. Issues around it not answering (like above) and answering but somehow having stale/wrong info have burned me too many times to trust it. It may be a lvmetad bug, or be udevd weirdness. The only si

[linux-lvm] Issue after upgrading the LVM2 package from 2.02.176 to 2.02.180

2020-09-14 Thread KrishnaMurali Chennuboina
Hi Team, While trying to analyze one the issue, we felt that upgrading the current LVM2 package in our repository will be the best approach. As part of that, we have updated the respective package from 2.02.176 to 2.02.180. We have verified the same and booted x86_64 hardware without any issues.