Dne 17. 09. 20 v 23:41 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Il 2020-09-17 21:27 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
You've most likely found the bug and this should be likely disable
(and enabled only with some force option).
Hi Zdenek, I am not sure about what bug I found - can you be more explicit?
Problem
Il 2020-09-17 21:27 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
You've most likely found the bug and this should be likely disable
(and enabled only with some force option).
Hi Zdenek, I am not sure about what bug I found - can you be more
explicit?
Problem is, when such device stack is used for XFS -
Dne 16. 09. 20 v 0:26 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Il 2020-09-15 23:47 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
Speaking of thin volumes - there can be at most 2^24 thin devices
(this is hard limit you've ask for ;)) - but you have only ~16GiB of
metadata to store all of them - which gives you ~1KiB of data
Dne 16. 09. 20 v 0:32 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Il 2020-09-15 20:34 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
Dne 14. 09. 20 v 23:44 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Hi all,
I am testing lvmcache with VDO and I have issue with devices block size.
The big & slow VDO device is on top of a 4-disk MD RAID 10 device
Dne 16. 09. 20 v 6:25 Tomas Dalebjörk napsal(a):
thanks for all the good reflections
the intention is to see if backups can be done in a much more easy way than
have ever been built before
Assuming you have checked projects like 'snapper' ?
another solution could be to store the lv as file
Dne 16. 09. 20 v 6:58 Tomas Dalebjörk napsal(a):
just curious about this:
Worth to note there is fixed strict limit of the ~16GiB maximum
thin-pool kernel metadata size - which surely can be exhausted -
mapping holds info about bTree mappings and sharing chunks between
devices
would that
There is only a reject, there are no included devices. Once you add a
filter it overrides the default filter including all I believe.
The fixes may have been fixing filtering as once you specify a filter
then there is no implied include (anymore). You should probably look
at the list of fixes
On 9/10/20 8:34 AM, heming.zhao wrote:
On 9/10/20 1:17 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 09. 09. 20 v 18:47 Zhao Heming napsal(a):
report LV is usable for upper layer.
leave issues
- this patch doesn't contain dm table comparison. So if the disk
is removed then re-inserted, but the re-inserted
Hi Roger,
Thanks for the information shared.
Filter which we used in our conf file was,
# Accept every block device:
filter = [ "r|^/dev/drbd.*|" ]
Thanks.
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 16:36, Roger Heflin wrote:
> #1:
> Device /dev/sda3 excluded by a filter.)
> Failed to execute
Hi Roger,
Missed to add my comment in the earlier mail.
>From the filter it should not exclude /dev/sda*. But not sure why it is
being excluded while executing pvcreate command.
Thanks.
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 18:28, KrishnaMurali Chennuboina <
krishchennu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
