On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:16:08PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 09:42 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 06:34:06AM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > > Hello David and Peter,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 10:38 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> > > > On Mo
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:56:09AM -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:16:08PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > Hm. This would mean that the switch to event-based PV detection could
> > happen before "udev settle" ends. A coldplug storm of uevents could
> > create 1000s of PVs i
A possibility I just debugged for a non-booting system.
If there is a partition table on the underlying device then that
device is not detected as an LVM1/2 member in at least one version of
udevd, and won't be seen nor turned on automatically by the
systemd-udev code.
lvm vgchange -ay worked to
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:16:08PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Hm. This would mean that the switch to event-based PV detection could
> happen before "udev settle" ends. A coldplug storm of uevents could
> create 1000s of PVs in a blink after event-based detection was enabled.
> Wouldn't that resur
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 06:34:06AM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Hello David and Peter,
>
> On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 10:38 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:00:32PM +0200, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
> > > > - We could use the new lvm-activate-* services to replace the
> > > > activ
