>Controllers remap blocks all on their own and the so-called geometry
is entirely fictitious anyway
so tell me then, why i have a shelf full with dead disks where half of
them are out of business for nothing but a couple of bad sectors ?
i don't see the point that hardware capable storing teraby
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:44 AM matthew patton wrote:
>
> > my plan is to scan a disk for usable sectors and map the logical volume
> > around the broken sectors.
>
> 1977 called, they'd like their non-self-correcting HD controller
> implementations back.
>
> From a real-world perspective there i
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 01:29:42PM +0800, Zhiyong Ye wrote:
> and lv on it. I then turn on the multipath function and merge the two paths
> into a new device (/dev/mapper/matha), and I get the following error when I
> execute the lvm command.
>
> # pvs
> WARNING: Not using device /dev/mapper/matha
On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 02:21:50PM +0200, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> doing some performance tests i noticed that lvmraid + integrity + thinpool
> outperforms zfs z1 by 5x while offering the same features. (snapshots,
> integrity)
>
> Is this somehow unsafe or how come it is so unpopular?
>
Il 2023-04-09 14:21 Arvid Picciani ha scritto:
Hi,
doing some performance tests i noticed that lvmraid + integrity +
thinpool outperforms zfs z1 by 5x while offering the same features.
(snapshots, integrity)
Is this somehow unsafe or how come it is so unpopular?
lvcreate --type raid1 --mirrors
