On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 02:40:43PM +0800, heming.zhao wrote:
> Does it acceptable to add new status bit in lv->status?
> I ever sent it in previoud patch "[PATCH v2] lib/metadata: add new api
> lv_is_available()"
> The define as below (the 'NOT_AVAIL_LV' will change to 'NOT_USABLE_LV'):
> ```
> +#
On 9/7/20 10:32 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 05. 09. 20 v 11:08 heming.z...@suse.com napsal(a):
On 9/5/20 5:06 PM, Zhao Heming wrote:
report LV is usable for upper layer.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming
---
lib/activate/activate.h | 2 +
lib/activate/dev_manager.c | 67 ++
Dne 05. 09. 20 v 11:08 heming.z...@suse.com napsal(a):
On 9/5/20 5:06 PM, Zhao Heming wrote:
report LV is usable for upper layer.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming
---
lib/activate/activate.h | 2 +
lib/activate/dev_manager.c | 67
lib/metadata/metadata-exp
On 9/5/20 5:06 PM, Zhao Heming wrote:
> report LV is usable for upper layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming
> ---
> lib/activate/activate.h | 2 +
> lib/activate/dev_manager.c | 67
> lib/metadata/metadata-exported.h | 1 +
> lib/metadata/metadata.c
On 9/5/20 5:06 PM, Zhao Heming wrote:
> report LV is usable for upper layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming
> ---
> lib/activate/activate.h | 2 +
> lib/activate/dev_manager.c | 67
> lib/metadata/metadata-exported.h | 1 +
> lib/metadata/metadata.c
report LV is usable for upper layer.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Heming
---
lib/activate/activate.h | 2 +
lib/activate/dev_manager.c | 67
lib/metadata/metadata-exported.h | 1 +
lib/metadata/metadata.c | 130 +++
lib/report/colu