Re: [linux-lvm] LVM RAID10 busy 100%

2019-04-05 Thread John Stoffel
> "Andrew" == Andrew Luke Nesbit writes: Sorry for the delay in replying! Andrew> On 03/04/2019 02:40, John Stoffel wrote: Andrew> [...] >> I'd probably re-do the RAID using RAID4 (fixed parity disk) since >> you're (probably) just doing a bunch of writing of video files, which >> are large

Re: [linux-lvm] LVM RAID10 busy 100%

2019-04-03 Thread Andrew Luke Nesbit
On 03/04/2019 02:40, John Stoffel wrote: [...] > I'd probably re-do the RAID using RAID4 (fixed parity disk) since > you're (probably) just doing a bunch of writing of video files, which > are large streaming writes, so you won't pay the penalty of the > Reade/Modify/Write cycle that RAID4/5 has

Re: [linux-lvm] LVM RAID10 busy 100%

2019-04-02 Thread John Stoffel
Viacheslav> I made LVM RAID10 from 8 HDDs with size 8T on CentOS 7 server. Viacheslav> # lvs -a -o name,segtype,devices Viacheslav>   LV  Type Devices Viacheslav>   data    raid10 Viacheslav> data_rimage_0(0),data_rimage_1(0),data_rimage_2(0),data_rimage_3

[linux-lvm] LVM RAID10 busy 100%

2019-04-02 Thread Viacheslav Dubrovskyi
Hi, I made LVM RAID10 from 8 HDDs with size 8T on CentOS 7 server. # lvs -a -o name,segtype,devices   LV                      Type Devices   data                    raid10 data_rimage_0(0),data_rimage_1(0),data_rimage_2(0),data_rimage_3(0),data_rimage_4