Dne 17. 09. 20 v 23:41 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Il 2020-09-17 21:27 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
You've most likely found the bug and this should be likely disable
(and enabled only with some force option).
Hi Zdenek, I am not sure about what bug I found - can you be more explicit?
Problem
Il 2020-09-17 21:27 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
You've most likely found the bug and this should be likely disable
(and enabled only with some force option).
Hi Zdenek, I am not sure about what bug I found - can you be more
explicit?
Problem is, when such device stack is used for XFS -
Dne 16. 09. 20 v 0:32 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Il 2020-09-15 20:34 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
Dne 14. 09. 20 v 23:44 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Hi all,
I am testing lvmcache with VDO and I have issue with devices block size.
The big & slow VDO device is on top of a 4-disk MD RAID 10 device
Il 2020-09-15 20:34 Zdenek Kabelac ha scritto:
Dne 14. 09. 20 v 23:44 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Hi all,
I am testing lvmcache with VDO and I have issue with devices block
size.
The big & slow VDO device is on top of a 4-disk MD RAID 10 device
(itself on top of dm-integrity). Over the VDO
Dne 14. 09. 20 v 23:44 Gionatan Danti napsal(a):
Hi all,
I am testing lvmcache with VDO and I have issue with devices block size.
The big & slow VDO device is on top of a 4-disk MD RAID 10 device (itself on
top of dm-integrity). Over the VDO device I created a thinpool and a thinvol
[1]. When
Hi all,
I am testing lvmcache with VDO and I have issue with devices block size.
The big & slow VDO device is on top of a 4-disk MD RAID 10 device
(itself on top of dm-integrity). Over the VDO device I created a
thinpool and a thinvol [1]. When adding the cache device to the volume
group via
