On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:38:38AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007 4:14:20 pm Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > Anyway, here's a try to make it autodetect m68k-linux-gnu-gcc and
> > > m68k-linux-gcc. Perhaps it can be generalized in kbuild, to allow
> > > arch/*/Makefile to set a li
On Thursday 18 October 2007 4:14:20 pm Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Anyway, here's a try to make it autodetect m68k-linux-gnu-gcc and
> > m68k-linux-gcc. Perhaps it can be generalized in kbuild, to allow
> > arch/*/Makefile to set a list of possible cross-compiler prefixes?
>
> Here is my first try.
> W
>
> Anyway, here's a try to make it autodetect m68k-linux-gnu-gcc and
> m68k-linux-gcc. Perhaps it can be generalized in kbuild, to allow
> arch/*/Makefile to set a list of possible cross-compiler prefixes?
Here is my first try.
We only touch CROSS_COMPILE is empty and building for another arch.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 07:31:54PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 15 October 2007 3:25:35 pm Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > 64-bit parisc tests if /usr/bin/hppa64-linux-gnu- exists.
> > If yes, it sets CROSS_COMPILE to hppa64-linux-gnu-.
> > If no, it sets CROSS_COMPILE to hppa64-linux-
> >
>
On Monday 15 October 2007 3:25:35 pm Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 64-bit parisc tests if /usr/bin/hppa64-linux-gnu- exists.
> If yes, it sets CROSS_COMPILE to hppa64-linux-gnu-.
> If no, it sets CROSS_COMPILE to hppa64-linux-
>
> 32-bit parisc unconditionally sets CROSS_COMPILE to hppa-linux-.
>
> T
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:51:00AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > > If your cross-compiler is called differently than the default on in
> > > > arch/*/Makefile,
> > >
> > > Part of the problem is that th
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:51:00AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > If your cross-compiler is called differently than the default on in
> > > arch/*/Makefile,
> >
> > Part of the problem is that there is no compelling default. The name of
> > the cr
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Finn Thain wrote:
> > If your cross-compiler is called differently than the default on in
> > arch/*/Makefile,
>
> Part of the problem is that there is no compelling default. The name of
> the cross-compiler can vary depending on the chosen executable prefix or
> the chosen
>
> If your cross-compiler is called differently than the default on in
> arch/*/Makefile,
Part of the problem is that there is no compelling default. The name of
the cross-compiler can vary depending on the chosen executable prefix or
the chosen target tuple.
Let's say I create new cross t
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 11:26:07 am Finn Thain wrote:
> My toolchains override the default prefix to just the target, resulting
> in "m68k-gcc". (It's shorter, and when you're creating a dozen toolchains
> having them all say -linux- in the middle of
On Thursday 11 October 2007 11:26:07 am Finn Thain wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Reading the patch in that link, recent cross compilers from _where_?
> > > Buildroot? Cross-tools? Gentoo embedded? Cross Linux From Scratch?
> > > My Firmware Linux project?
> > >
>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Reading the patch in that link, recent cross compilers from _where_?
> > Buildroot? Cross-tools? Gentoo embedded? Cross Linux From Scratch?
> > My Firmware Linux project?
> >
> > You assume they all use the same name, yet your patch chang
>
> > 2) suggested functionality makes it easy to do make headers_install
>
> This is something completely different (cfr. the other thread handling
> it). If `make headers_install' doesn't need the cross compiler, it
> should not try to execute it.
This is obviously correct.
It happens that we
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 7:46:47 am Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:25:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > > Rip out hardwir
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:27:12AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 7:46:47 am Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:25:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > BTW, m68k-linux-gnu- is the default name for
On Thursday 11 October 2007 7:46:47 am Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:25:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > From: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > Rip out har
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:25:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > From: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Rip out hardwired cross compiler name assumption that only m68k makes.
> > >
> > > Sig
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:25:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> > From: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Rip out hardwired cross compiler name assumption that only m68k makes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
On Thursday 11 October 2007 2:25:19 am Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> > From: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Rip out hardwired cross compiler name assumption that only m68k makes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > When
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> From: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Rip out hardwired cross compiler name assumption that only m68k makes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> When you cross compile, you have to set the prefix CROSS_COMPILE to your
> cross co
20 matches
Mail list logo
