Move a copy of the definitions of the *_relaxed() macros into io_no.h
and io_mm.h. This precedes a change to the io_no.h file to use
asm-generic/io.h. They will be removed from io_no.h at that point.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer
---
arch/m68k/include/asm/io.h| 8
arch/m68k/include/as
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Move a copy of the definitions of the *_relaxed() macros into io_no.h
> and io_mm.h. This precedes a change to the io_no.h file to use
> asm-generic/io.h. They will be removed from io_no.h at that point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer
Revie
On 12/04/18 04:50, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Move a copy of the definitions of the *_relaxed() macros into io_no.h
and io_mm.h. This precedes a change to the io_no.h file to use
asm-generic/io.h. They will be removed from io_no.h at that poin
Hi Greg,
thanks for this great job.
On patch 10, PIC is PCI, right ?
In case you hae some time, am interested in understanding how those
guards
#define xxx xxx
works.
Is it ok to test the patch now in my mcf54415 based board ?
Reviewed-by: Angelo Dureghello
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:54:1
Hi Angelo,
On 18/04/18 06:53, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> thanks for this great job.
:-)
> On patch 10, PIC is PCI, right ?
Yes, typo on my part. I even managed to get it wrong twice!
I'll fix that.
> In case you hae some time, am interested in understanding how those
> guards
>
> #define x
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:01:34AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Angelo,
>
> On 18/04/18 06:53, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> > thanks for this great job.
>
> :-)
>
>
> > On patch 10, PIC is PCI, right ?
>
> Yes, typo on my part. I even managed to get it wrong twice!
> I'll fix that.
Hi Angelo,
On 19/04/18 06:27, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:01:34AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 18/04/18 06:53, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
[snip]
Is it ok to test the patch now in my mcf54415 based board ?
Yes, please do. I expect it should fix the the issues you found
