Add buffer length check to sanity checks for USERPTR QBUF
Signed-off-by: Michael Jones
---
Changes for v2:
- only check when V4L2_MEMORY_USERPTR
drivers/media/video/omap3isp/ispqueue.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/omap3isp/ispq
Hello
That patch is technically fine and I liked it much since get rid of
complex repeater logic and going for normal I2C-gate.
But fix these and send new patch:
1) there is a lot of style errors. you should use always checkpatch.pl
before send patches.
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file drivers/medi
Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Monday 08 August 2011 14:40:27 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:40:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
A possibility to prealloca
Hi Hans,
On Monday 08 August 2011 14:40:27 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:40:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > A possibility to preallocate and ini
Hi Guennadi,
On Monday 08 August 2011 19:29:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 08 August 2011 17:36:32 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Nowadays many of the V4L2 camera device drivers heavily depend on the
> > > boar
Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari
It looks just fine.
regards
Antti
On 08/08/2011 01:35 PM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> On Martes, 2 de Agosto de 2011 21:21:13 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
>> On Jueves, 28 de Julio de 2011 21:25:01 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
>>> On Miércoles, 27 de Julio de
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Adam Baker wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > I will send a second reply to this message, which deals in particular
> > > with the list of abilities you outlined above. The point is, the
> > > situation as to that list of abilities is more
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Adam Baker wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, in practice the "fork" would presumably be carried out by yours
> > > truly. Presumably with the advice and help of concerned parties. too.
> > > Since I am involved on both
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> > > > Maybe a good compromise would be to create a kind of stub driver that
> > > > could negotiate the device access while still delegating most of the
> > > > real work to userspace.
> > >
> > > Hooray. This appears to me to be a very good solution.
On Monday 08 August 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > I will send a second reply to this message, which deals in particular
> > with the list of abilities you outlined above. The point is, the
> > situation as to that list of abilities is more chaotic than is generally
> > realized. And when
Jarod Wilson wrote:
The nuvoton-cir driver was storing up consecutive pulse-pulse and
space-space samples internally, for no good reason, since
ir_raw_event_store_with_filter() already merges back to back like
samples types for us. This should also fix a regression introduced late
in 3.0 that rel
On Monday 08 August 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> >
> > Well, in practice the "fork" would presumably be carried out by yours
> > truly. Presumably with the advice and help of concerned parties. too.
> > Since I am involved on both the kernel side and the libgphoto2 side of
> > the s
The nuvoton-cir driver was storing up consecutive pulse-pulse and
space-space samples internally, for no good reason, since
ir_raw_event_store_with_filter() already merges back to back like
samples types for us. This should also fix a regression introduced late
in 3.0 that related to a timeout chan
Em 08-08-2011 16:32, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
>> Doing an specific libusb-like approach just for those cams seems to be the
>> wrong direction, as such driver would be just a fork of an already existing
>> code. I'm all against duplicating it.
>
> Well, in practice the "fork" would presumably b
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> > >
> > > > This indirectly answers my question, above, about whatever device there
> > > > may or may not b
On 08/06/2011 08:13 AM, Alistair Buxton wrote:
> On 6 August 2011 04:56, Alistair Buxton wrote:
>> With the latest driver my card never gets a signal lock, not even
>> once. As before there are no error messages. It does always probe
>> correctly now though.
>
> I tracked this down to:
>
> http:
Hi Sarah,
Em 08-08-2011 14:58, Sarah Sharp escreveu:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08/05/2011 12:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:21:47PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> I think it is important to separate oranges from a
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 08-08-2011 14:39, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> >> Em 07-08-2011 23:26, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
> >>>
> >>> (first of two replies to Adam's message; second reply deals with
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> >
> > > This indirectly answers my question, above, about whatever device there
> > > may or may not be. What I get from this, and also from a bit of snooping
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for
the kernels and architectures in the list below.
Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb:
date:Mon Aug 8 19:00:18 CEST 2011
git hash:9bed77ee2fb46b74782d0d9d14b92e9d07f3df6e
gcc version: i686-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.5
Em 08-08-2011 14:39, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>> Em 07-08-2011 23:26, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
>>>
>>> (first of two replies to Adam's message; second reply deals with other
>>> topics)
>>>
>>> On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Adam Baker wrote:
>>
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 01:23:56PM -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 08/05/2011 12:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > >On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:21:47PM -0300, Mauro
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 08/05/2011 12:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > >On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:21:47PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > I think it is important to separate oranges from apples
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> > This indirectly answers my question, above, about whatever device there
> > may or may not be. What I get from this, and also from a bit of snooping
> > around, is that there is not any dev that gets cre
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/05/2011 12:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:21:47PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> I think it is important to separate oranges from apples here, there are
> at least 3 different problem classes
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 07-08-2011 23:26, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
> >
> > (first of two replies to Adam's message; second reply deals with other
> > topics)
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Adam Baker wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday 05 August 2011, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Laurent
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
> On Monday 08 August 2011 17:36:32 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Nowadays many of the V4L2 camera device drivers heavily depend on the board
> > code to set up voltage supplies, clocks, and some contr
G2D is a 2D graphics accelerator engine present in the s5p family
of Samsung SoCs. It is capable of bitblt and raster operations on
images having dimensions of up to 8000x8000.
Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
Hi,
This patch adds the G2D 2D graphics accelerator driv
Fix section mismatch in the MFC driver.
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski
Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/media/video/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c | 11 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc.c
b/d
Hi folks,
I was reading the source code of various dvb related utilities and I
was wondering about forming up the message which instructs the DiSEqC
switch. But I found out that different programs produce the command
differently.
The confusing thing is that according to the DiSEqC specification
doc
Anssi Hannula wrote:
On 08.08.2011 08:57, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 01:18:11AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Add keymap for the Medion X10 RF remote which uses the ati_remote
driver, and default to it based on the usb id.
Since rc-core supports loading custom keytmaps should
Hi everybody,
The V4L2 brainstorming meeting held in Cambourne from August the 1st to August
the 5th was a success. I would like to thank Linaro again, and particularly
Stephen Doel and Arwen Donaghey, for accommodating us during the whole week.
Here is a summary of the discussions, with prelim
Hi Sylwester,
On Monday 08 August 2011 17:36:32 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Nowadays many of the V4L2 camera device drivers heavily depend on the board
> code to set up voltage supplies, clocks, and some control signals, like
> 'reset' and 'standby' signals for the sensors. Those
Hi everyone,
Nowadays many of the V4L2 camera device drivers heavily depend on the board
code to set up voltage supplies, clocks, and some control signals, like 'reset'
and 'standby' signals for the sensors. Those things are often being done
by means of the driver specific platform data callbacks.
On Monday, August 08, 2011 15:25:26 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 08-08-2011 03:22, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 19:45:36 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 03-08-2011 14:21, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> >>> As already announced, we're continuing the planning
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> This indirectly answers my question, above, about whatever device there
> may or may not be. What I get from this, and also from a bit of snooping
> around, is that there is not any dev that gets created in order to be
> accessed by libusb. Just an
- Allows to select Turbo QPSK (SYS_TURBO + QPSK)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter
---
drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/gp8psk-fe.c | 17 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/gp8psk-fe.c
b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/gp8psk-fe.c
in
- Allow to distinguish turbo code from DVB-S
Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter
---
Documentation/DocBook/media/dvb/dvbproperty.xml |1 +
include/linux/dvb/frontend.h|1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/dvb/dv
- When converting satellite receiver parameters from S2API to legacy,
identify a satellite receiver by its 'delivery_system' instead of
'modulation', which may overlap between different delivery systems.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter
---
drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c | 13 +
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Adam Baker wrote:
> Further testing reveals the situation is more complex than I first thought -
> the behaviour I get depends upon whether what gets plugged in is a full speed
> or a high speed device. After I've run the test of running gphoto whilst
> streaming from a supp
On 08.08.2011 08:57, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 01:18:11AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
>> Add keymap for the Medion X10 RF remote which uses the ati_remote
>> driver, and default to it based on the usb id.
>
> Since rc-core supports loading custom keytmaps should we ass medio
Em 07-08-2011 23:26, Theodore Kilgore escreveu:
>
> (first of two replies to Adam's message; second reply deals with other
> topics)
>
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Adam Baker wrote:
>
>> On Friday 05 August 2011, Hans de Goede wrote:
This sounds to be a good theme for the Workshop, or even to KS/
Em 08-08-2011 03:22, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 19:45:36 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em 03-08-2011 14:21, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
>>> As already announced, we're continuing the planning for this year's
>>> media subsystem workshop.
>>>
>>> To avoid overridin
On Monday, August 08, 2011 13:40:23 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > > in V4L2 is required for an effi
On Monday 08 August 2011 11:16:41 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> > in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> > This patch adds two new
On Martes, 2 de Agosto de 2011 21:21:13 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
> On Jueves, 28 de Julio de 2011 21:25:01 Jose Alberto Reguero escribió:
> > On Miércoles, 27 de Julio de 2011 21:22:26 Antti Palosaari escribió:
> > > On 07/24/2011 12:45 AM, Jose Alberto Reguero wrote:
> > > > Read without wri
Hi Laurent,
On 08/08/2011 12:08 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Friday 05 August 2011 13:41:54 Michael Jones wrote:
>> On 08/05/2011 10:59 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Hi Michael,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch.
>>>
>>> On Thursday 04 August 2011 17:40:37 Michael Jones wrote:
Hi Pawel,
On Friday 05 August 2011 17:01:09 Pawel Osciak wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 01:55, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Marek and Pawel,
> >
> > While reviewing an OMAP3 ISP patch, I noticed that videobuf2 doesn't
> > verify the buffer length field value when a new USERPTR buffer is
> > qu
Hi Michael,
On Friday 05 August 2011 13:41:54 Michael Jones wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 10:59 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Thursday 04 August 2011 17:40:37 Michael Jones wrote:
> >> Add buffer length to sanity checks for QBUF.
> >>
> >> Signed-
Hi Michael,
On Friday 05 August 2011 11:33:20 Michael Jones wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 10:47 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 June 2011 10:31:52 Michael Jones wrote:
> >> Hi Laurent,
> >>
> >> I'm observing a system freeze-up with the ISP when writing data to
> >> memory directly from t
Hi Guennadi!
On Friday, August 05, 2011 09:47:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> This patch adds two new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and
> VIDIOC_PREPAR
Hi Guennadi,
Thanks for the patch. I have a few comments below.
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> The two recently added ioctl()s VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF
> allow user-space applications to allocate video buffers of different
> sizes and hand them over to the driver for fast switchi
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> A possibility to preallocate and initialise buffers of different sizes
> in V4L2 is required for an efficient implementation of asnapshot mode.
> This patch adds two new ioctl()s: VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS and
> VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF and defines respective data structures.
>
>
Hi,
On 08/08/2011 12:53 AM, Adam Baker wrote:
On Friday 05 August 2011, Hans de Goede wrote:
This sounds to be a good theme for the Workshop, or even to KS/2011.
Agreed, although we don't need to talk about this for very long, the
solution is basically:
1) Define a still image retrieval API f
54 matches
Mail list logo
