Re: [PATCH for v3.18 00/18] Backport CVE-2017-13166 fixes to Kernel 3.18

2018-03-29 Thread Inki Dae
2018년 03월 29일 16:00에 Greg KH 이(가) 쓴 글: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:39:54PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote: >> 2018년 03월 29일 13:25에 Greg KH 이(가) 쓴 글: >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 08:22:08AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote: >>>> Really thanks for doing this. :) There would be many use

Re: [PATCH for v3.18 00/18] Backport CVE-2017-13166 fixes to Kernel 3.18

2018-03-28 Thread Inki Dae
2018년 03월 29일 13:25에 Greg KH 이(가) 쓴 글: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 08:22:08AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote: >> Really thanks for doing this. :) There would be many users who use >> Linux-3.18 for their products yet. > > For new products? They really should not be. The kernel is

Re: [PATCH for v3.18 00/18] Backport CVE-2017-13166 fixes to Kernel 3.18

2018-03-28 Thread Inki Dae
served field. > > I noticed an extra bug while testing it, but the bug also hits upstream, > and should be backported all the way down all stable/LTS versions. > So, I'll send it the usual way, after merging upsream. Really thanks for doing this. :) There would be many users who

Re: [RFC 0/4] Exynos DRM: add Picture Processor extension

2017-05-10 Thread Inki Dae
2017년 05월 10일 16:55에 Daniel Vetter 이(가) 쓴 글: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 03:27:02PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> 2017년 05월 10일 14:38에 Tomasz Figa 이(가) 쓴 글: >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >

Re: [RFC 0/4] Exynos DRM: add Picture Processor extension

2017-05-10 Thread Inki Dae
2017년 05월 10일 15:38에 Tomasz Figa 이(가) 쓴 글: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Inki Dae wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> 2017년 05월 10일 14:38에 Tomasz Figa 이(가) 쓴 글: >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>&

Re: [RFC 0/4] Exynos DRM: add Picture Processor extension

2017-05-09 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Tomasz, 2017년 05월 10일 14:38에 Tomasz Figa 이(가) 쓴 글: > Hi Everyone, > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >> >> >> 2017년 04월 26일 07:21에 Sakari Ailus 이(가) 쓴 글: >>> Hi Marek, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:23:09PM +0200,

Re: [RFC 0/4] Exynos DRM: add Picture Processor extension

2017-05-09 Thread Inki Dae
ications that need to support > similar devices will bear the burden of having to support different APIs. > > I don't mean to say that you should ram whatever under V4L2 / MC > independently of how unworkable that might be, but there are also clear > advantages in using a standa

Re: [PATCH v2] dma-buf: Wait on the reservation object when sync'ing before CPU access

2016-12-18 Thread Inki Dae
2016년 08월 16일 01:02에 Daniel Vetter 이(가) 쓴 글: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:42:18PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Rendering operations to the dma-buf are tracked implicitly via the >> reservation_object (dmabuf->resv). This is used to allow poll() to >> wait upon outstanding rendering (or just quer

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/exynos: Convert g2d_userptr_get_dma_addr() to use get_vaddr_frames()

2015-07-17 Thread Inki Dae
On 2015년 07월 17일 19:31, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 07/17/2015 12:29 PM, Inki Dae wrote: >> On 2015년 07월 17일 19:20, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>> On 07/13/2015 04:55 PM, Jan Kara wrote: >>>> From: Jan Kara >>>> >>>> Convert g2d_userptr_get_dma_a

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/exynos: Convert g2d_userptr_get_dma_addr() to use get_vaddr_frames()

2015-07-17 Thread Inki Dae
ver. Also it fixes a problem that the function has been mapping user >> provided address without holding mmap_sem. > > I'd like to see an Ack from one of the exynos drm driver maintainers before > I merge this. > > Inki, Marek? I already gave Ack but it seems tha

Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/exynos: Convert g2d_userptr_get_dma_addr() to use get_vaddr_frames()

2015-05-14 Thread Inki Dae
AGE_SHIFT; > - g2d_userptr->npages = npages; > - > - pages = drm_calloc_large(npages, sizeof(struct page *)); The declaration to pages isn't needed anymore because you removed it. > - if (!pages) { > - DRM_ERROR("failed to allocate pages.\n"); > -

Re: exynos4 / g2d

2014-02-10 Thread Inki Dae
tested this driver on Exynos4 based platforms and > hence cannot confirm if it > supports 4x12 in the current form. I leave it to the original author > and Inki to comment about it. > Just add "samsung,exynos4212-g2d" to exynos_g2d_match if you want to use g2d driver on ex

[PATCH v9 1/2] dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization framework

2013-09-17 Thread Inki Dae
CPU access to a shared buffer if there is someone accessing the shared buffer. If no anyone then select system call will be returned at once. References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Signed-o

[PATCH v2 2/2] dma-buf: Add user interfaces for dmabuf sync support

2013-09-17 Thread Inki Dae
ler doesn't use intefaces for the DMA device driver. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 81 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c in

[PATCH v9 0/2] Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-09-17 Thread Inki Dae
<-- Request gpu rendering time | | |<-- Request page flip (deferred) | <- vsync signal |<-- Displayed on screen | | | | <- vsy

[PATCH v8 0/2] Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-29 Thread Inki Dae
rred) | <- vsync signal |<-- Displayed on screen | | | | <- vsync signal Thanks, Inki Dae References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3]

[PATCH v2 2/2] dma-buf: Add user interfaces for dmabuf sync support

2013-08-29 Thread Inki Dae
ler doesn't use intefaces for the DMA device driver. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 81 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/

[PATCH v8 1/2] dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-29 Thread Inki Dae
ll be returned at once. References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt | 286 drivers/base/Kconfig

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] dma-buf: Add user interfaces for dmabuf sync support

2013-08-22 Thread Inki Dae
Thanks for your comments, Inki Dae > -Original Message- > From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:17 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > arm-ker...@lists.infradea

[PATCH v7 1/2] dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-21 Thread Inki Dae
buffer. If no anyone then select system call will be returned at once. References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt |

[PATCH v2 2/2] dma-buf: Add user interfaces for dmabuf sync support

2013-08-21 Thread Inki Dae
ler doesn't use intefaces for the DMA device driver. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 81 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/

[PATCH v7 0/2] Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-21 Thread Inki Dae
| <- vsync signal Thanks, Inki Dae References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Inki Dae (2): dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization framework dma-buf: Add user interfaces for dma

RE: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC PATCH v6] dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-21 Thread Inki Dae
Thanks for the review, Inki Dae > -Original Message- > From: linux-fbdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-fbdev- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:22 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedes

RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] [media] exynos-mscl: Add new driver for M-Scaler

2013-08-20 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shaik Ameer Basha > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:07 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Shaik Ameer Basha; LMML; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org;

RE: [PATCH v2 4/5] [media] exynos-mscl: Add DT bindings for M-Scaler driver

2013-08-19 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shaik Ameer Basha > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 7:59 PM > To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: s.nawro...@samsung.com; posc...@go

RE: [PATCH v2 1/5] [media] exynos-mscl: Add new driver for M-Scaler

2013-08-19 Thread Inki Dae
Just quick review. > -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Shaik Ameer Basha > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 7:59 PM > To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: s.nawro...@samsu

RE: [PATCH v2 0/5] Exynos5 M-Scaler Driver

2013-08-19 Thread Inki Dae
YNOS5 SoCs. All Exynos5 SoCs really have this IP? It seems that only Exynos5420 and maybe Exynos5410 have this IP, NOT Exynos5250. Please check it again and describe it surely over the all patch series. Thanks, Inki Dae > > This device supports the following as key features. > inp

[Resend][RFC PATCH v6 0/2] Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-13 Thread Inki Dae
gnal |<-- Displayed on screen | | | | <- vsync signal Thanks, Inki Dae References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Inki Dae (2): [RFC PATCH v6] dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization f

[RFC PATCH v6 0/2] Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-13 Thread Inki Dae
<- vsync signal |<-- Displayed on screen | | | | <- vsync signal Thanks, Inki Dae References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] htt

[PATCH 2/2] [RFC PATCH v2] dma-buf: Add user interfaces for dmabuf sync support.

2013-08-13 Thread Inki Dae
ler doesn't use intefaces for the DMA device driver. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 81 +++ include/linux/dmabuf-sync.h |1 + 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --gi

[PATCH 1/2] [RFC PATCH v6] dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization framework

2013-08-13 Thread Inki Dae
once. References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt | 285 + drivers/base/Kconfig |7 +

About buffer sychronization mechanism and cache operation

2013-08-12 Thread Inki Dae
including user land interfaces (fcntl and select system calls), and the dmabuf sync framework could meet it. Thanks, Inki Dae -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[RFC PATCH 0/2 v5] Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-07-11 Thread Inki Dae
/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Inki Dae (2): [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] dma-buf: add lock callback for fcntl system call Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt | 290 +

[RFC PATCH v5 1/2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-07-11 Thread Inki Dae
, please refer to [3] References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [3] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt | 290 + drivers/base/Kconfig |7 +

[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] dma-buf: add lock callback for fcntl system call

2013-07-11 Thread Inki Dae
This patch adds lock callback to dma buf file operations, and this callback will be called by fcntl system call. With this patch, fcntl system call can be used for buffer synchronization between CPU and CPU, and CPU and DMA in user mode. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park

[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] dma-buf: add lock callback for fcntl system call.

2013-07-10 Thread Inki Dae
This patch adds lock callback to dma buf file operations, and this callback will be called by fcntl system call. With this patch, fcntl system call can be used for buffer synchronization between CPU and CPU, and CPU and DMA in user mode. Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park

[RFC PATCH v4 1/2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-07-10 Thread Inki Dae
470339/ [2] http://lwn.net/Articles/532616/ [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [4] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt | 283 + drivers/base/Kconfig |7 + drivers/base/Makefile

[RFC PATCH v4 0/2] Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-07-10 Thread Inki Dae
. References: [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] http://lwn.net/Articles/532616/ [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ [4] http://linux.die.net/man/2/fcntl Inki Dae (2): dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework dma-buf: add lock callback for fcntl system call. Doc

Re: [RFC PATCH] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-26 Thread Inki Dae
2013/6/25 Jerome Glisse : > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >> 2013/6/25 Rob Clark : >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>>>> that >>>>> should be the role of kernel memory management which of course needs >&g

Re: [RFC PATCH] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-25 Thread Inki Dae
2013/6/25 Rob Clark : > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Inki Dae wrote: >>> that >>> should be the role of kernel memory management which of course needs >>> synchronization btw A and B. But in no case this should be done using >>> dma-buf. dma-buf is fo

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-21 Thread Inki Dae
2013/6/21 Lucas Stach : > Hi Inki, > > please refrain from sending HTML Mails, it makes proper quoting without > messing up the layout everywhere pretty hard. > Sorry about that. I should have used text mode. > Am Freitag, den 21.06.2013, 20:01 +0900 schrieb Inki Dae: > [.

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-20 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de] > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:11 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Russell King - ARM Linux'; 'Inki Dae'; 'linux-fbdev'; 'YoungJun Cho'; > 'Kyung

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-20 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de] > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 4:47 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Russell King - ARM Linux'; 'Inki Dae'; 'linux-fbdev'; 'YoungJun Cho'; > 'Kyung

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-19 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: dri-devel-bounces+inki.dae=samsung@lists.freedesktop.org > [mailto:dri-devel-bounces+inki.dae=samsung@lists.freedesktop.org] On > Behalf Of Russell King - ARM Linux > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:29 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: lin

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-19 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de] > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 7:22 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Russell King - ARM Linux'; 'linux-fbdev'; 'Kyungmin Park'; 'DRI > mailing list'; 'myungjo

[RFC PATCH v3] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-19 Thread Inki Dae
8e9ea9e865592719ef6b1cde58366af9f5c [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] http://lwn.net/Articles/532616/ [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2625361/ Signed-off-by: Inki Dae Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt | 199 drivers/base/Kcon

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-18 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Lucas Stach [mailto:l.st...@pengutronix.de] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:47 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Russell King - ARM Linux'; 'linux-fbdev'; 'Kyungmin Park'; 'DRI > mailing list'; 'myungjo

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-18 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:43 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Maarten Lankhorst'; 'linux-fbdev'; 'Kyungmin Park'; 'DRI mailing > list'; &

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-17 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 3:21 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst; linux-fbdev; Kyungmin Park; DRI mailing list; Rob > Clark; myungjoo.ham; YoungJun Cho; Daniel Vetter

RE: [RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-17 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@canonical.com] > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 8:35 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger

[RFC PATCH v2] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-17 Thread Inki Dae
Such cache operations are invoked via dma-buf interfaces so the dma buf exporter should implement dmabuf->ops->begin_cpu_access/end_cpu_access callbacks. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] http://lwn.net/Articles/532616/ [3] https://patchwork-mail1.kernel.org/patch/2625321/ Si

RE: [RFC PATCH] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-13 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Russell, > -Original Message- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 2:26 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: maarten.lankho...@canonical.com; dan...@ffwll.ch; robdcl...@gmail.com; > linux-fb...@vger.

RE: [RFC PATCH] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-13 Thread Inki Dae
> +static void dmabuf_sync_timeout_worker(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct dmabuf_sync *sync = container_of(work, struct dmabuf_sync, > work); > + struct dmabuf_sync_object *sobj; > + > + mutex_lock(&sync->lock); > + > + list_for_each_entry(sobj, &sync->syncs, head) { > +

[RFC PATCH] dmabuf-sync: Introduce buffer synchronization framework

2013-06-13 Thread Inki Dae
ccess/end_cpu_access callbacks. [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/470339/ [2] http://lwn.net/Articles/532616/ [3] https://patchwork-mail1.kernel.org/patch/2625321/ Signed-off-by: Inki Dae --- Documentation/dma-buf-sync.txt | 246 ++ drivers/base/Kconfig |7 + drivers/b

Introduce a dmabuf sync framework for buffer synchronization

2013-06-07 Thread Inki Dae
at there is a better/more generic way. The above all things is just quick implementation for buffer synchronization so this should be more cleaned up and there might be my missing point. Please give me your advices and opinions. Thanks, Inki Dae -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-28 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of > Daniel Vetter > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:50 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Rob Clark; Maarten Lankhorst; linux-fbdev; YoungJun Cho; Kyungmin Park; > myungjoo.ham; DR

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-28 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-fbdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-fbdev- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rob Clark > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:49 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst; Daniel Vetter; linux-fbdev; YoungJun Cho; Kyungmin > Pa

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-28 Thread Inki Dae
ent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:33 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Rob Clark'; 'Maarten Lankhorst'; 'Daniel Vetter'; 'linux-fbdev'; > 'YoungJun Cho'; 'Kyungmin Park'; 'myungjoo.ham'; 'DRI mailing list'; > linux-arm-ker

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-27 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of > Daniel Vetter > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:02 AM > To: Rob Clark > Cc: Inki Dae; Maarten Lankhorst; linux-fbdev; YoungJun Cho; Kyungmin Park; > myungjoo.ham; DRI ma

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-27 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-fbdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-fbdev- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rob Clark > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:48 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst; Daniel Vetter; linux-fbdev; YoungJun Cho; Kyungmin > Pa

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-27 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@canonical.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:23 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Daniel Vetter'; 'Rob Clark'; 'linux-fbdev'; 'YoungJun Cho'; 'Kyungmin &

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-27 Thread Inki Dae
inions and advices in advance before RFC posting. Thanks, Inki Dae -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-23 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of > Daniel Vetter > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 8:56 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Rob Clark; linux-fbdev; DRI mailing list; Kyungmin Park; myungjoo.ham; > YoungJ

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-21 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel > Vetter > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 4:45 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Daniel Vetter'; 'Rob Clark'; 'linux-fbdev'; 'DRI mailing list'; &g

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-21 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel > Vetter > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:31 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Rob Clark; linux-fbdev; DRI mailing list; Kyungmin Park; myungjoo.ham; > YoungJun Cho; linux-arm-ker..

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-14 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Rob Clark [mailto:robdcl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 10:39 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: linux-fbdev; DRI mailing list; Kyungmin Park; myungjoo.ham; YoungJun > Cho; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger.kernel

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-13 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Rob Clark [mailto:robdcl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:58 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: linux-fbdev; DRI mailing list; Kyungmin Park; myungjoo.ham; YoungJun > Cho; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger.kernel

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-13 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-fbdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-fbdev- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Maarten Lankhorst > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 8:41 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Rob Clark'; 'Daniel Vetter'; 'DRI mailing lis

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-13 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@canonical.com] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 6:52 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Rob Clark'; 'Daniel Vetter'; 'DRI mailing list'; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradea

RE: Introduce a new helper framework for buffer synchronization

2013-05-13 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankho...@canonical.com] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 5:01 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Rob Clark; Daniel Vetter; DRI mailing list; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; linux-fbde

RE: [PATCH v3] drm/exynos: enable FIMD clocks

2013-04-21 Thread Inki Dae
't say what you are doing. You are just adding > relevant calls to clk_prepare/unprepare() before calling > clk_enable/disable. > > > Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan > > --- > > Changes since v2: > > - moved clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare()

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/exynos: enable FIMD clocks

2013-03-27 Thread Inki Dae
if (ret) { > + clk_disable_unprepare(ctx->lcd_clk); > + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable 'fimd' clock\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + Please remove the above two clk_prepare_enable function calls and use them in fimd_clock() instea

RE: [PATCH v12 2/2] drm/exynos: enable OF_VIDEOMODE and FB_MODE_HELPERS for exynos drm fimd

2013-03-07 Thread Inki Dae
..bb25130 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/Kconfig > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ config DRM_EXYNOS_DMABUF > config DRM_EXYNOS_FIMD > bool "Exynos DRM FIMD" > depends on DRM_EXYNOS && !FB_S3C && !AR

RE: [PATCH] drm/exynos: modify the compatible string for exynos fimd

2013-03-06 Thread Inki Dae
Already merged. :) > -Original Message- > From: Vikas Sajjan [mailto:vikas.saj...@linaro.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 4:09 PM > To: InKi Dae > Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; > kgene@samsung.com; Joonyoung Shim; sunil j

Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] video: drm: exynos: Add display-timing node parsing using video helper function

2013-03-06 Thread Inki Dae
or pdata failed\n"); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + ret = of_get_fb_videomode(dev->of_node, &pdata->panel.timing, > + OF_USE_NATIVE_MODE); Add "select OF_VIDEOMODE" and "select FB_MODE_HELPERS" to drivers/gpu/drm/exyn

RE: [PATCH v6 1/1] video: drm: exynos: Add display-timing node parsing using video helper function

2013-02-20 Thread Inki Dae
; + OF_USE_NATIVE_MODE); > + if (ret) { > + DRM_ERROR("failed: of_get_fb_videomode()\n" > + "with return value: %d\n", ret); > + return ret; >

Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] video: drm: exynos: Add display-timing node parsing using video helper function

2013-02-14 Thread Inki Dae
2013/2/6 Vikas Sajjan : > Add support for parsing the display-timing node using video helper > function. > > The DT node parsing and pinctrl selection is done only if 'dev.of_node' > exists and the NON-DT logic is still maintained under the 'else' part. > > Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala > S

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-12 Thread Inki Dae
2013/2/12 Sylwester Nawrocki : > On 02/12/2013 02:17 PM, Inki Dae wrote: >> Applied and will go to -next. >> And please post the document(in >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/) for it later. > > There is already some old patch applied in the devicetree/next tree:

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-12 Thread Inki Dae
Applied and will go to -next. And please post the document(in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/) for it later. Thanks, Inki Dae 2013/2/6 Sachin Kamat : > From: Ajay Kumar > > This patch adds device tree match table for Exynos G2D controller. > > Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-06 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sylwester Nawrocki > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 8:24 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: 'Sachin Kamat'; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; dri- &

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-06 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.ka...@linaro.org] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 5:03 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; > devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; k.deb...@samsung.com; > s

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-05 Thread Inki Dae
Looks good to me but please add document for it. To other guys, And is there anyone who know where this document should be added to? I'm not sure that the g2d document should be placed in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu, media, drm/exynos or arm/exynos. At least, this document should be

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-04 Thread Inki Dae
2013/2/4 Sachin Kamat : > On 1 February 2013 18:28, Inki Dae wrote: >> >> >> >> >> 2013. 2. 1. 오후 8:52 Inki Dae 작성: >> >>> >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:lin

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 6/7] reservation: cross-device reservation support

2013-02-03 Thread Inki Dae
f could be accessed by two more devices. So I guess that the fence_excl could be used for write access(may need buffer sync like blocking) and read access for the fence_shared(may not need buffer sync). I'm not sure that I understand these two things correctly so could you please give me

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-01 Thread Inki Dae
2013. 2. 1. 오후 8:52 Inki Dae 작성: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- >> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sachin Kamat >> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:40 PM >> To: Inki Dae >> Cc:

RE: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-01 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sachin Kamat > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:40 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki; Kukjin Kim; Sylwester Nawrocki; linux- > me...@vg

RE: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-02-01 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sachin Kamat > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:13 PM > To: Sylwester Nawrocki > Cc: Inki Dae; Kukjin Kim; Sylwester Nawrocki; linux-media@vger.ke

RE: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-01-31 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Kukjin, > -Original Message- > From: linux-media-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-media- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kukjin Kim > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 9:15 AM > To: 'Sylwester Nawrocki'; 'Inki Dae' > Cc: 'Sachin Kam

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/7] fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization (v11)

2013-01-31 Thread Inki Dae
2013/1/31 Daniel Vetter : > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:32:15PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote: >> Hi, >> >> below is my opinion. >> >> > +struct fence; >> > +struct fence_ops; >> > +struct fence_cb; >> > + >> > +/** >> > + * s

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/7] fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization (v11)

2013-01-31 Thread Inki Dae
;flags has FENCE_FLAG_ACCESS_WRITE_BIT as write operation and then other sides(read or write operation) would wait for the write operation completion. And also consumer calls that function with FENCE_FLAG_ACCESS_READ_BIT so that other consumers could ignore the fence-wait to any read operations.

RE: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-01-30 Thread Inki Dae
> -Original Message- > From: Sylwester Nawrocki [mailto:sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:51 AM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: Sachin Kamat; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; dri- > de...@lists.freedesktop.org; devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org; &g

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery support for G2D

2013-01-30 Thread Inki Dae
2013/1/25 Sachin Kamat : > From: Ajay Kumar > > This patch adds device tree match table for Exynos G2D controller. > > Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 10 ++ > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 5/7] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)

2013-01-24 Thread Inki Dae
2013/1/16 Maarten Lankhorst : > Op 16-01-13 07:28, Inki Dae schreef: >> 2013/1/15 Maarten Lankhorst : >>> This type of fence can be used with hardware synchronization for simple >>> hardware that can block execution until the condition >>> (dma_buf[offset] -

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 5/7] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)

2013-01-16 Thread Inki Dae
2013/1/16 Maarten Lankhorst : > Op 16-01-13 07:28, Inki Dae schreef: >> 2013/1/15 Maarten Lankhorst : >>> This type of fence can be used with hardware synchronization for simple >>> hardware that can block execution until the condition >>> (dma_buf[offset] -

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 5/7] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)

2013-01-15 Thread Inki Dae
elper_signal(struct fence_helper *fh, int id); - This function is called by device's interrupt handler or somewhere when dma access to this buffer has been completed and calls fence_signal() with each fence registed to each reservation object in fh->entries to notify dma access completion to o

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] video: display: Adding frame related ops to MIPI DSI video source struct

2013-01-09 Thread Inki Dae
ler to 1 to do it and also check whether the data transmission in the framebuffer is done on lcd panel to avoid tearing issue and some confliction issue(A) between read and write operations like below, lcd_panel_frame_done_interrrupt_handler() { ... if (mipi-dsi frame done)

Re: [RFC 0/5] Generic panel framework

2012-10-20 Thread Inki Dae
correct some typo. Sorry for this. 2012/10/20 Inki Dae : > Hi Laurent. sorry for being late. > > 2012/8/17 Laurent Pinchart : >> Hi everybody, >> >> While working on DT bindings for the Renesas Mobile SoC display controller >> (a.k.a. LCDC) I quickly realized

Re: [RFC 0/5] Generic panel framework

2012-10-20 Thread Inki Dae
ld start the video stream in between. > > I realize this could be done with the PANEL_ENABLE_* levels in your RFC, > but I don't think the concepts quite match: > > - PANEL_ENABLE_BLANK level is needed for "smart panels", as we need to > configure them and send the

Re: [RFC 0/5] Generic panel framework

2012-10-20 Thread Inki Dae
el support > video: panel: Add R61517 panel support how about using 'buses' directory instead of 'panel' and adding 'panel' under that like below? video/buess: display bus frameworks such as MIPI-DBI/DSI and eDP are placed. video/buess/panel: panel drivers

RE: [PATCH v1 01/14] media: s5p-hdmi: add HPD GPIO to platform data

2012-10-04 Thread Inki Dae
Hello Media guys, This is dependent of exynos drm patch set to be merged to mainline so if there is no problem then please, give me ack so that I can merge this patch with exynos drm patch set. Thanks, Inki Dae > -Original Message- > From: RAHUL SHARMA [mailto:rahul.sha...@samsu

  1   2   >