Hello Guennadi,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2011, 09:14 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, LBM wrote:
my dear Guennadi
I'm wrong about that v4l2-int-device,maybe it just V4L2.
Now i have a board of OMAP3530 and a cmos camera MT9M111,so i want
to get the
Hello Guennadi,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.05.2011, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
Hi Teresa
I'm adding Mauro to CC, because we were discussing adding these (this one
and mt9m111) patches to .39.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Teresa Gámez wrote:
The setup of the pixel clock is done wrong
this, too.
Teresa
Thanks
Guennadi
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Teresa Gamez wrote:
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Teresa Gamez:
Hello Guennadi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Guennadi
Liakhovetski:
Hello Teresa
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 15:27 +0200 schrieb Teresa Gamez:
Hello Guennadi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Guennadi
Liakhovetski:
Hello Teresa
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Teresa Gamez wrote:
Hello Guennadi,
the datasheet also says (see table 3):
quote
Hello Guennadi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Guennadi
Liakhovetski:
Hello Teresa
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Teresa Gamez wrote:
Hello Guennadi,
the datasheet also says (see table 3):
quote
Pixel clock out. DOUT is valid on rising edge of this
clock.
/quote
Hello Guennadi,
Sorry for the first mail...
The datasheet also says (see table 3):
quote
Pixel clock out. DOUT is valid on rising edge of this
clock.
/quote
There is a difference between DOUT beeing vaild and DOUT beeing set up.
So does SOCAM_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING mean that the data is valid at