Identifying a memory-to-memory video device through an ORed output and capture
capability flags is not reliable. Schedule this for removal.

Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 
b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 09701af..950d84a 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -558,3 +558,17 @@ Why:       The V4L2_CID_VCENTER, V4L2_CID_HCENTER controls 
have been deprecated
        There are newer controls (V4L2_CID_PAN*, V4L2_CID_TILT*) that provide
        similar functionality.
 Who:   Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What:  Using V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE and V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT flags
+       to indicate a V4L2 memory-to-memory device capability
+When:  3.8
+Why:   New drivers should use new V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_M2M capability flag
+       to indicate a V4L2 video memory-to-memory (M2M) device and
+       applications can now identify a M2M video device by checking
+       for V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_M2M, with VIDIOC_QUERYCAP ioctl. Using ORed
+       V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_CAPTURE and V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT flags for M2M
+       devices is ambiguous and may lead, for example, to identifying
+       a M2M device as a video capture or output device.
+Who:   Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com>
--
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to