On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:49:57PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:38:30AM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
> >On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 12:52:12PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> >> Whether we decide to go for any new keytable ioctl():s or not in rc-core,
> >> we
> >> should
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:38:30AM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 12:52:12PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>> Whether we decide to go for any new keytable ioctl():s or not in rc-core, we
>> should provide the protocol information of keypresses to userspace.
>>
>> Note that this
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 12:52:12PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
> Whether we decide to go for any new keytable ioctl():s or not in rc-core, we
> should provide the protocol information of keypresses to userspace.
>
> Note that this means that the RC_TYPE_* definitions become part of the
>
Whether we decide to go for any new keytable ioctl():s or not in rc-core, we
should provide the protocol information of keypresses to userspace.
Note that this means that the RC_TYPE_* definitions become part of the
userspace <-> kernel API/ABI (meaning a full patch should maybe move those
