I've attached a patch that correctly sets the max/min/default values
for the hdpvr picture controls. The reason the current values didn't
cause a problem until now is because any firmware <= 0.15 didn't
support them. The latest firmware releases properly support picture
controls and the values in t
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>>> Em 21-10-2011 01:33, Taylor Ralph escreveu:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Taylor Ralph
wrote:
> On
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
>> Em 21-10-2011 01:33, Taylor Ralph escreveu:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Taylor Ralph
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Looks sane to me, and really needs to get in ASAP. I'd even suggest we
> get it sent to stable, as these newer firmware HDPVR are pretty wonky
> with any current kernel.
>
> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson
> Reviewed-by: Jarod Wilson
> CC: sta...@vge
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> Looks sane to me, and really needs to get in ASAP. I'd even suggest we
>> get it sent to stable, as these newer firmware HDPVR are pretty wonky
>> with any current kernel.
>>
>> Ack
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
> I've attached a patch that correctly sets the max/min/default values
> for the hdpvr picture controls. The reason the current values didn't
> cause a problem until now is because any firmware <= 0.15 didn't
> support them. The latest firmware
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
>> I've attached a patch that correctly sets the max/min/default values
>> for the hdpvr picture controls. The reason the current values didn't
>> cause a problem until now is becaus
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:30:11AM -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
> > I've attached a patch that correctly sets the max/min/default values
> > for the hdpvr picture controls. The reason the current values didn't
> > cause a problem until now
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:30:11AM -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Taylor Ralph
>> wrote:
>> > I've attached a patch that correctly sets the max/min/default values
>> > for the hdpvr picture controls. Th
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:35:40PM -0400, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
> >
> > I've looked at them only at very beginning and if I recall correctly
> > they had no visible effects. The values in the linux driver were taken
> > from sniffing the w
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
> I think such scenario is unlikely but I don't know it for sure and
> I don't want to force anyone to test every firmware version.
> Ignoring them for firmware version < 16 should be safe since we assume
> they had no effect. Returning -EINVAL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
>> I think such scenario is unlikely but I don't know it for sure and
>> I don't want to force anyone to test every firmware version.
>> Ignoring them for firmware version < 16 should
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Devin Heitmueller
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
>>> I think such scenario is unlikely but I don't know it for sure and
>>> I don't want to force anyone to test every firmwar
Em 21-10-2011 01:33, Taylor Ralph escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Devin Heitmueller
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
I think such scenario is unlikely but I don't know it for sure and
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em 21-10-2011 01:33, Taylor Ralph escreveu:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Devin Heitmueller
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
> I
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Taylor Ralph wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
>> Em 21-10-2011 01:33, Taylor Ralph escreveu:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Taylor Ralph
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Devin Heitmueller
wrote:
>
On 2012-02-14 17:09:55 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Devin Heitmueller
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> Looks sane to me, and really needs to get in ASAP. I'd even suggest we
> >> get it sent to stable, as these newer firmware
Em 15-02-2012 09:46, Janne Grunau escreveu:
> On 2012-02-14 17:09:55 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Devin Heitmueller
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
Looks sane to me, and really needs to get in ASAP. I'd even suggest we
18 matches
Mail list logo
