Hi Shawn,
On Friday 03 May 2013 16:00:24 Shawn Nematbakhsh wrote:
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the changes! I agree that your synchronization logic is
correct. Just two small comments:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 17:42:32 Shawn Nematbakhsh
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for the changes! I agree that your synchronization logic is
correct. Just two small comments:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com wrote:
Hi Shawn,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 17:42:32 Shawn Nematbakhsh
Hi Shawn,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 17:42:32 Shawn Nematbakhsh wrote:
While usb_kill_urb is in progress, calls to usb_submit_urb will fail
with -EPERM (documented in Documentation/usb/URB.txt). The UVC driver
does not correctly handle this case -- there is no
From: Shawn Nematbakhsh sha...@chromium.org
While usb_kill_urb is in progress, calls to usb_submit_urb will fail
with -EPERM (documented in Documentation/usb/URB.txt). The UVC driver
does not correctly handle this case -- there is no synchronization
between uvc_v4l2_open / uvc_status_start and
While usb_kill_urb is in progress, calls to usb_submit_urb will fail
with -EPERM (documented in Documentation/usb/URB.txt). The UVC driver
does not correctly handle this case -- there is no synchronization
between uvc_v4l2_open / uvc_status_start and uvc_v4l2_release /
uvc_status_stop.
This patch
