Mike Isely wrote:
> Acked-By: Mike Isely
>
> (in the context of the pvrusb2 driver related changes)
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
> -Mike
>
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>> Made necessary by 6992f5334995af474c2b58d010d08bc597f0f2fe.
>>
>> Found by this semantic patch:
>>
Acked-By: Mike Isely
(in the context of the pvrusb2 driver related changes)
-Mike
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Made necessary by 6992f5334995af474c2b58d010d08bc597f0f2fe.
>
> Found by this semantic patch:
>
> @ init @
> type T;
> identifier A;
> @@
>
> T {
>
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:40:28PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> My standard question - are all of these need to be dynamically
> allocated?
I have my doubts for a few of them. Still, this would be a more intrusive
change than just fixing the BUG appearance, so I'd like to leave that task for
t
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 07:21:17AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Made necessary by 6992f5334995af474c2b58d010d08bc597f0f2fe.
>
> Found by this semantic patch:
>
> @ init @
> type T;
> identifier A;
> @@
>
> T {
> ...
> struct device_attribute A
Made necessary by 6992f5334995af474c2b58d010d08bc597f0f2fe.
Found by this semantic patch:
@ init @
type T;
identifier A;
@@
T {
...
struct device_attribute A;
...
};
@ main extends init @
expression E;
statement S;
identifier err;