On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em 06-10-2011 00:02, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
>>
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:38:13 -0700 Randy Dunlap
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/30/11 14:34, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Both mt9t001.c and mt9p031.c have two identical
Em 06-10-2011 00:02, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
Hi Mauro,
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:38:13 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 09/30/11 14:34, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Both mt9t001.c and mt9p031.c have two identical issues, those
being that they will need module.h inclusion for the upcoming
cleanup going
Hi Mauro,
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:38:13 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 09/30/11 14:34, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > Both mt9t001.c and mt9p031.c have two identical issues, those
> > being that they will need module.h inclusion for the upcoming
> > cleanup going on there, and that their dependencies
On 09/30/11 14:34, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Both mt9t001.c and mt9p031.c have two identical issues, those
> being that they will need module.h inclusion for the upcoming
> cleanup going on there, and that their dependencies don't limit
> selection of configs that will fail to compile as follows:
>
Both mt9t001.c and mt9p031.c have two identical issues, those
being that they will need module.h inclusion for the upcoming
cleanup going on there, and that their dependencies don't limit
selection of configs that will fail to compile as follows:
drivers/media/video/mt9p031.c:457: error: implicit
