A DVB demultiplexer device can be used to set up either a PES filter or
a section filter. In the former case, the ts field of the feed union of
struct dmxdev_filter is used, in the latter case the sec field of the
same union is used.
The ts field is a struct list_head, and is currently initialized
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 13:49 +0100, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> A DVB demultiplexer device can be used to set up either a PES filter or
> a section filter. In the former case, the ts field of the feed union of
> struct dmxdev_filter is used, in the latter case the sec field of the
> same union is used.
Hi!
Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 10:13 -0500 schrieb Andy Walls:
> On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 13:49 +0100, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> > A DVB demultiplexer device can be used to set up either a PES filter or
> > a section filter. In the former case, the ts field of the feed union of
> > struct dmxdev_filt
Francesco Lavra wrote:
> A DVB demultiplexer device can be used to set up either a PES filter or
> a section filter. In the former case, the ts field of the feed union of
> struct dmxdev_filter is used, in the latter case the sec field of the
> same union is used.
> The ts field is a struct list_he
Hello Mauro,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Good catch, but it seems better to initialize both the mutex and the list head
> at dvb_dmx_dev_init. Please test if the following patch fixes the issue. If
> so, please
> sign.
please apply Francesco's original patch. Yours won't work, because
"feed"
Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 13:24 +0100 schrieb Andreas Oberritter:
> Hello Mauro,
>
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Good catch, but it seems better to initialize both the mutex and the list
> > head
> > at dvb_dmx_dev_init. Please test if the following patch fixes the issue. If
> > so, please
Hello Mr. Shack,
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Chicken Shack wrote:
> I vote for Andy Walls, Devin Heitmueller. There are a couple of capable
> candidates here who can really do that job with a better output for the
> whole Linux community.
> There is ABSOLUTELY NO necessity to continue with Ma
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
>
> This is a SCANDAL, not fun! This is SCANDALOUS!
I agree that this whole thread has been totally inappropriate from
beginning to end.
On all sides, btw. I would suggest that somebody who can't even use his
own name should be the last to complain a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> - if somebody reports a regression, IT MUST BE FIXED. Not "discussed" for
>two weeks. Not talked around. If we have a bisected commit that starts
>oopsing with an existing setup that used to work, there is no
>discussion. That commit absolutely _has_ to be r
Op maandag 08-02-2010 om 14:43 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Chicken
Shack:
> Now if I were a cynical or ranter or another kind of dumb primitive
> persona non grata I would just add "Lol" or stuff like that and turn
> myself away.
>
> But this is no fun here.
>
> It's nothing but a big proof tha
Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 08:14 -0800 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
> >
> > This is a SCANDAL, not fun! This is SCANDALOUS!
>
> I agree that this whole thread has been totally inappropriate from
> beginning to end.
Yes, as a matter of frustration and th
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
> ...
Please stop emailing me. I'm simply not interested in your political
troubles with the DVB people.
I see with my own eyes why people have issues with your way of
communication, and quite frankly, I'm not interested in discussing
name-calling wit
Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 11:09 -0800 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > ...
>
> Please stop emailing me. I'm simply not interested in your political
> troubles with the DVB people.
>
> I see with my own eyes why people have issues with your way of
> comm
Chicken Shack wrote:
ok anonymous chicken
you've managed a distinct first: i've installed a block filter on your
email address.
Rudy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vg
Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 08:14 -0800 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
>
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
> >
> > This is a SCANDAL, not fun! This is SCANDALOUS!
>
> I agree that this whole thread has been totally inappropriate from
> beginning to end.
The initial problem was, how to find s
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 01:53 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 08:14 -0800 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a SCANDAL, not fun! This is SCANDALOUS!
> >
> > I agree that this whole thread has been totally i
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 17:09 -0500 schrieb Richard Stallman:
> "Banning you as a punishment seems foolishly harsh, too."
>
> The word "too" is there because, in my previous paragraph, I said it
> seemed you had been overly harsh in your criticism. Everyone makes
> mistakes. Being busy is n
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 09:38 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 01:53 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > Am Montag, den 08.02.2010, 08:14 -0800 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a SCANDAL, not fun! Th
18 matches
Mail list logo
