On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:29:27 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
binding model. I've split it into 6 pieces for easier review. (...)
Did anyone test these patches, please?
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Jean,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 14:29 +0200 schrieb Jean Delvare:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:29:27 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
binding model. I've split it into 6 pieces for easier review. (...)
Did anyone test these
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:29:27 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
binding model. I've split it into 6 pieces for easier review. (...)
Did anyone test these patches,
Hi all,
Here comes an update of my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c
binding model. I've split it into 6 pieces for easier review. Firstly
there is 1 preliminary patch:
01-ir-kbd-i2c-dont-abuse-client-name.patch
Then 3 patches doing the actual conversion:
Hi Andy,
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:22:59 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
I tested your original patch set so you can get some real feedback. The
news is good, but I'll bore you with the details first. :)
1. My setup:
HVR-1600: Hauppauge model 74041, rev C5B2, serial# 891351
has no radio, has
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 07:56:22 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Thanks a lot for the testing!
You're welcome.
Sorry for being such a pain to what I suspect you hoped was to be a
simple change.
You must be kidding. For one thing, I
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Andy,
Note that struct IR_i2c_init_data only contains the fields I needed at
the moment, but it would be trivial to extend it to allow bridge
drivers to pass more setup information if needed, for example ir_type.
Yeah, I could have
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:24:27 +0200
Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org wrote:
Hi all,
Here finally comes my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c binding
model. I've split it into 6 pieces for easier review. Firstly there are
2 preliminary patches:
Hi Mauro,
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:01:16 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
From the discussions we already have, I noticed some points to take care of:
1) about the lirc support, I don't think we should change a kernel driver due
to an out-of-tree kernel driver. As I've commented on PATCH 3/6
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Mauro,
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:01:16 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
From the discussions we already have, I noticed some points to take care of:
1) about the lirc support, I don't think we should change a kernel driver
due
to an
Hi all,
Here finally comes my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c binding
model. I've split it into 6 pieces for easier review. Firstly there are
2 preliminary patches:
media-video-01-cx18-fix-i2c-error-handling.patch
media-video-02-ir-kbd-i2c-dont-abuse-client-name.patch
Then 2 patches
Jean:
I understand what you're trying to do but how is LIRC expected to still
work if all drivers now force the user over to ir-kbd?
-Mike
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi all,
Here finally comes my conversion of ir-kbd-i2c to the new i2c binding
model. I've split it into 6
12 matches
Mail list logo
