Re: [PATCH 0/9] Unify i2c_mux_add_adapter error reporting

2017-04-19 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:27:48 +0200 Peter Rosin escreveu: > On 2017-04-03 12:27, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message > >> on failure, but the

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Unify i2c_mux_add_adapter error reporting

2017-04-11 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2017-04-03 10:38, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > > Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message > on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One > or two of those users actually add more information than already > provided by the central failure message. > > So,

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Unify i2c_mux_add_adapter error reporting

2017-04-03 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2017-04-03 12:27, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message >> on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One >> or two of those users actually add more information

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Unify i2c_mux_add_adapter error reporting

2017-04-03 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > > Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message > on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One > or two of those users actually add more information than already > provided by the central failure

[PATCH 0/9] Unify i2c_mux_add_adapter error reporting

2017-04-03 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! Many users of the i2c_mux_add_adapter interface log a message on failure, but the function already logs such a message. One or two of those users actually add more information than already provided by the central failure message. So, first fix the central error reporting to provide as much