I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the 
corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c 
b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c
index a62c01e..69719c7 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 #define MAX_XFER_SIZE  64
 
 static unsigned int verbose;
-module_param(verbose, int, 0644);
+module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(verbose, "Set Verbosity level");
 
 static int stv6110x_read_reg(struct stv6110x_state *stv6110x, u8 reg, u8 *data)
-- 
2.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to