On 11.01.2014 21:53, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:37:30 +0100
Frank Schäfer escreveu:
Am 10.01.2014 19:45, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
Just filling urb->interval with 1 is wrong, and causes a different
behaviour with xHCI.
With EHCI, the URB size is typically 192 by
Em Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:37:30 +0100
Frank Schäfer escreveu:
> Am 10.01.2014 19:45, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> > Just filling urb->interval with 1 is wrong, and causes a different
> > behaviour with xHCI.
> >
> > With EHCI, the URB size is typically 192 bytes. However, as
> > xHCI specifies i
Am 10.01.2014 19:45, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Just filling urb->interval with 1 is wrong, and causes a different
> behaviour with xHCI.
>
> With EHCI, the URB size is typically 192 bytes. However, as
> xHCI specifies intervals in microframes, the URB size becomes
> too short (24 bytes).
>
>
Just filling urb->interval with 1 is wrong, and causes a different
behaviour with xHCI.
With EHCI, the URB size is typically 192 bytes. However, as
xHCI specifies intervals in microframes, the URB size becomes
too short (24 bytes).
With this patch, the interval will be properly initialized, and
t
