Em Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:34:04 +0100
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Sat January 5 2013 03:54:44 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Hans/Devin,
> >
> > Em Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:59:40 -0500
> > Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> >
> > > TRY_FMT should not return an error if a pixelformat is unsupported.
> > >
On Sat January 5 2013 03:54:44 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hans/Devin,
>
> Em Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:59:40 -0500
> Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
>
> > TRY_FMT should not return an error if a pixelformat is unsupported. Instead
> > just
> > pick a common pixelformat.
> >
> > Also the bytesperline
Hans/Devin,
Em Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:59:40 -0500
Devin Heitmueller escreveu:
> TRY_FMT should not return an error if a pixelformat is unsupported. Instead
> just
> pick a common pixelformat.
>
> Also the bytesperline calculation was incorrect: it used the old width
> instead of
> the provided w
TRY_FMT should not return an error if a pixelformat is unsupported. Instead just
pick a common pixelformat.
Also the bytesperline calculation was incorrect: it used the old width instead
of
the provided with, and it miscalculated the bytesperline value for the depth ==
12
case.
Signed-off-by: H
