On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate out_work_queue. Drop it
and use system_wq instead. The in_work_queue needs to be ordered so
can't use one of the system wqs; however, as it isn't used to reclaim
memory, allocate the workqueue
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:54:56PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
2. To prevent work items being handled by keventd/n from being delayed
too long, as the deferred work in question can involve a bit of sleeping
due to contention, the workload of the CX23418's MPEG encoding engine,
and the
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 09:36 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:54:56PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
2. To prevent work items being handled by keventd/n from being delayed
too long, as the deferred work in question can involve a bit of sleeping
due to contention, the
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate out_work_queue. Drop it
and use system_wq instead. The in_work_queue needs to be ordered so
can't use one of the system wqs; however, as it isn't used to reclaim
memory, allocate the workqueue
