On 06-12-2011 19:03, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 12/06/2011 10:58 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On 06-12-2011 12:13, Thierry Reding wrote:
* Antti Palosaari wrote:
That question is related to that kind of indentation generally, not
only that patch.
On 12/06/2011 03:39 PM, Thierry Reding wrot
On 12/06/2011 10:58 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
On 06-12-2011 12:13, Thierry Reding wrote:
* Antti Palosaari wrote:
That question is related to that kind of indentation generally, not
only that patch.
On 12/06/2011 03:39 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Function parameters on subsequent lines s
On 06-12-2011 12:13, Thierry Reding wrote:
* Antti Palosaari wrote:
That question is related to that kind of indentation generally, not
only that patch.
On 12/06/2011 03:39 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Function parameters on subsequent lines should never be aligned with the
function name but rath
* Antti Palosaari wrote:
> That question is related to that kind of indentation generally, not
> only that patch.
>
> On 12/06/2011 03:39 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >Function parameters on subsequent lines should never be aligned with the
> >function name but rather be indented.
> [...]
> >
That question is related to that kind of indentation generally, not only
that patch.
On 12/06/2011 03:39 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Function parameters on subsequent lines should never be aligned with the
function name but rather be indented.
[...]
usb_set_interface(dev
Function parameters on subsequent lines should never be aligned with the
function name but rather be indented.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/media/video/tm6000/tm6000-video.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/tm6000/tm60
