Em Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:59:32 -0700
VDR User escreveu:
> I use nscan, which has easily been the
> most successful of the scanners. An additional benefit to nscan is you
> only supply a single transponder on the command line and it will
> populate a channel list for the entire
>> There is already a publicly available VDR repository offering the
>> current stable & developer versions, along with all previous versions:
>> http://www.tvdr.de/download.htm
>
> ?? these are tarballs, where is the version control system?
That would be a question for Klaus, the author of VDR.
Am 07.09.2016 um 19:59 schrieb VDR User :
>> It is broken (see below). Have you ever used dvbv5 tools with vdr format
>> output or did you know a "VDR user" who is using dvbv5-scan and not wscan?
>
> In my experience the v4l scanner, wscan, and VDR's internal scanner
> has
> It is broken (see below). Have you ever used dvbv5 tools with vdr format
> output or did you know a "VDR user" who is using dvbv5-scan and not wscan?
In my experience the v4l scanner, wscan, and VDR's internal scanner
has never worked well (for NA). I use nscan, which has easily been the
most
Am 06.09.2016 um 17:47 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab :
> Em Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:16:22 -0700
> VDR User escreveu:
>
>> I can tell you that people do still use VDR-1.6.0-3. It would be
>> unwise (and unnecessary) to break backwards compatible, which
Em Tue, 6 Sep 2016 08:16:22 -0700
VDR User escreveu:
> I can tell you that people do still use VDR-1.6.0-3. It would be
> unwise (and unnecessary) to break backwards compatible, which would be
> grounds for NACK if you ask me. Knowingly causing breakage has always
> been an
I can tell you that people do still use VDR-1.6.0-3. It would be
unwise (and unnecessary) to break backwards compatible, which would be
grounds for NACK if you ask me. Knowingly causing breakage has always
been an unpopular thing in the VDR community, and this sounds like
it's going beyond fixing
Em Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:01:22 +0100
Chris Mayo escreveu:
> On 05/09/16 14:25, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:13:04 +0200
> > Markus Heiser escreveu:
> >
> >> Hi Mauro, (Hi Chris)
> >>
> >> sorry for my late reply. I test the
Em Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:13:04 +0200
Markus Heiser escreveu:
> Hi Mauro, (Hi Chris)
>
> sorry for my late reply. I test the v4-utils on my HTPC,
> where I'am not often have time for experimentation ;-)
>
> Am 24.08.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>
Hi Mauro, (Hi Chris)
sorry for my late reply. I test the v4-utils on my HTPC,
where I'am not often have time for experimentation ;-)
Am 24.08.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab :
> Em Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:27 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:49:27 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> Hi Markus,
>
> Em Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:52:19 +0200
> Markus Heiser escreveu:
>
> > From: Markus Heiser
> >
> > From: Heiser, Markus
Hi Markus,
Em Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:52:19 +0200
Markus Heiser escreveu:
> From: Markus Heiser
>
> From: Heiser, Markus
>
> The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries
>
>
Am 16.08.2016 um 09:10 schrieb Markus Heiser :
> Am 10.08.2016 um 11:52 schrieb Markus Heiser :
>
>> The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries
>>
>> HD:11494:S1HC23I0M5N1O35:S:(null):22000:5101:5102,5103,5106,5108:0:0:10301:0:0:0:
Am 10.08.2016 um 11:52 schrieb Markus Heiser :
> The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries
>
> HD:11494:S1HC23I0M5N1O35:S:(null):22000:5101:5102,5103,5106,5108:0:0:10301:0:0:0:
> 0-:1:2--:3:4-:
>
> refering to the VDR Wikis ...
>
> *
From: Markus Heiser
From: Heiser, Markus
The vdr format was broken, I got '(null)' entries
HD:11494:S1HC23I0M5N1O35:S:(null):22000:5101:5102,5103,5106,5108:0:0:10301:0:0:0:
0-:1:2--:3:4-:
refering to the VDR Wikis ...
15 matches
Mail list logo