Re: [PATCH 3/7] af9015/af9013 full pid filtering

2011-11-12 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 11/12/2011 08:49 PM, Malcolm Priestley wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 18:25 +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: Does that patch force PID filter always on or what? Yes, and why not? Pid filtering has it uses in usb 2.0 and works very well. Low power and low bus usage. Actually, I do not know t

Re: [PATCH 3/7] af9015/af9013 full pid filtering

2011-11-12 Thread Malcolm Priestley
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 18:25 +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote: > On 11/12/2011 05:55 PM, Malcolm Priestley wrote: > > Allowing the pid to be enabled seems to suppress corrupted stream packets > > from the first frontend. This is mainly caused by other high speed devices > > on the usb bus. > > > > Full

Re: [PATCH 3/7] af9015/af9013 full pid filtering

2011-11-12 Thread Antti Palosaari
On 11/12/2011 05:55 PM, Malcolm Priestley wrote: Allowing the pid to be enabled seems to suppress corrupted stream packets from the first frontend. This is mainly caused by other high speed devices on the usb bus. Full pid filtering on all frontends. no_pid is defaulted to on. TS frame size it

[PATCH 3/7] af9015/af9013 full pid filtering

2011-11-12 Thread Malcolm Priestley
Allowing the pid to be enabled seems to suppress corrupted stream packets from the first frontend. This is mainly caused by other high speed devices on the usb bus. Full pid filtering on all frontends. no_pid is defaulted to on. TS frame size it limited to 21, this because if we are only filterin