On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 18:50:31 +0200 (CEST), Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, walter harms wrote:
> > Am 07.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> >> @@ -97,10 +96,8 @@ static int fc0011_readreg(struct fc0011_priv *priv, u8
> >> reg, u8 *val)
> >> {
> >>u8 dummy;
> >>struct i2c_msg
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 18:50:31 +0200 (CEST)
Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> @@ -97,10 +96,8 @@ static int fc0011_readreg(struct fc0011_priv *priv, u8
> >> reg, u8 *val)
> >> {
> >>u8 dummy;
> >>struct i2c_msg msg[2] = {
> >> - { .addr = priv->addr,
> >> -.flags = 0, .buf = ®,
Am 07.10.2012 18:50, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, walter harms wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 07.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Julia Lawall:
>>> From: Julia Lawall
>>>
>>> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>>>
>>> A length expressed as an explicit constant is also re-expres
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, walter harms wrote:
Am 07.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Julia Lawall:
From: Julia Lawall
Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
A length expressed as an explicit constant is also re-expressed as the size
of the buffer in each case.
A simplified version of th
Am 07.10.2012 17:38, schrieb Julia Lawall:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
>
> A length expressed as an explicit constant is also re-expressed as the size
> of the buffer in each case.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes
From: Julia Lawall
Introduce use of I2c_MSG_READ/WRITE/OP, for readability.
A length expressed as an explicit constant is also re-expressed as the size
of the buffer in each case.
A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
//
