On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 22:05:26 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:33:14 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi Ondrej!
> >
> > On Sunday, May 15, 2011 23:26:33 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Sunday, May 15, 2011 22:18:21 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > Thanks, it's much simpler with the new control fra
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:33:14 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Ondrej!
>
> On Sunday, May 15, 2011 23:26:33 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 15, 2011 22:18:21 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > Thanks, it's much simpler with the new control framework.
> > > Do the negative volume control values make sense? T
Hi Ondrej!
On Sunday, May 15, 2011 23:26:33 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Sunday, May 15, 2011 22:18:21 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > Thanks, it's much simpler with the new control framework.
> > Do the negative volume control values make sense? The TC9154A chip can
> > attenuate the volume from 0 to -68dB in
On Sunday, May 15, 2011 22:18:21 Ondrej Zary wrote:
> Thanks, it's much simpler with the new control framework.
> Do the negative volume control values make sense? The TC9154A chip can
> attenuate the volume from 0 to -68dB in 2dB steps.
It does make sense, but I think I would offset the values so
Thanks, it's much simpler with the new control framework.
Do the negative volume control values make sense? The TC9154A chip can
attenuate the volume from 0 to -68dB in 2dB steps.
--- linux-2.6.39-rc2-/drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c 2011-04-06
03:30:43.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.39-
