On 01/08/2018 06:55 PM, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> The v4l2_mbus_fmt width and height corresponds directly with the
> v4l2_pix_format definitions, yet the differences in documentation make
> it ambiguous what to do in the event of field heights.
>
> Clarify this using the same text as is provided for
Hi Kieran,
Thanks for your patch.
On 2018-01-08 17:55:24 +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> The v4l2_mbus_fmt width and height corresponds directly with the
> v4l2_pix_format definitions, yet the differences in documentation make
> it ambiguous what to do in the event of field heights.
>
> Clarify t
Hi Kieran,
Thanks for the update.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:55:24PM +, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> The v4l2_mbus_fmt width and height corresponds directly with the
> v4l2_pix_format definitions, yet the differences in documentation make
> it ambiguous what to do in the event of field heights.
>
The v4l2_mbus_fmt width and height corresponds directly with the
v4l2_pix_format definitions, yet the differences in documentation make
it ambiguous what to do in the event of field heights.
Clarify this using the same text as is provided for the v4l2_pix_format
which is explicit on the matter, an
