On 2014-10-26 20:33, Tomas Melin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:03 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu
wrote:
Wouldn't something like this be a simpler way of achieving the same
result? (untested):
The idea was to remove the empty change_protocol function that had
been added in the
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:42 AM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
On 2014-10-26 20:33, Tomas Melin wrote:
Please let me know your preferences on which you prefer, and, if
needed, I'll make a new patch version.
I'd prefer the above, minimal, approach. But it's Mauro who decides in
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:03 PM, David Härdeman da...@hardeman.nu wrote:
Wouldn't something like this be a simpler way of achieving the same
result? (untested):
The idea was to remove the empty change_protocol function that had
been added in the breaking commit.
IMHO, it would be better to not
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:30:17PM +0300, Tomas Melin wrote:
IR reciever using nuvoton-cir and lirc required additional configuration
steps after upgrade from kernel 3.16 to 3.17-rcX.
Bisected regression to commit da6e162d6a4607362f8478c715c797d84d449f8b
([media] rc-core: simplify sysfs code).
IR reciever using nuvoton-cir and lirc required additional configuration
steps after upgrade from kernel 3.16 to 3.17-rcX.
Bisected regression to commit da6e162d6a4607362f8478c715c797d84d449f8b
([media] rc-core: simplify sysfs code).
The regression comes from adding empty function change_protocol
