On 07/09/14 00:38, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 09/07/2014 01:37 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:37:21 +0100
Malcolm Priestley tvbox...@gmail.com escreveu:
On 06/09/14 17:24, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
On 06/09/14 03:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014
Moikka!,
thanks for the comments and advices.
I had been updating my code and during that, I also found that
updating property cache in tuner_ops.get_signal_strength() was
simple and (seemed to me) better than using a kthread,
so the current implementation (under testing) is just like
what Mauro
On 09/06/2014 07:08 AM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
Moikka!,
thanks for the comments and advices.
I had been updating my code and during that, I also found that
updating property cache in tuner_ops.get_signal_strength() was
simple and (seemed to me) better than using a kthread,
so the current
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:34:33 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
On 09/06/2014 06:17 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:10:01 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
... I simply don't understand why you want hook that RF strength call
via demod? The
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:36:14 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
On 09/06/2014 07:08 AM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
Moikka!,
thanks for the comments and advices.
I had been updating my code and during that, I also found that
updating property cache in
On 06/09/14 03:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so, which reads RSSI
and writes value to struct
On 06/09/14 17:24, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
On 06/09/14 03:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so, which
On 06/09/14 17:24, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
On 06/09/14 03:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so, which
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:37:21 +0100
Malcolm Priestley tvbox...@gmail.com escreveu:
On 06/09/14 17:24, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
On 06/09/14 03:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM,
On 09/07/2014 01:37 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:37:21 +0100
Malcolm Priestley tvbox...@gmail.com escreveu:
On 06/09/14 17:24, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
On 06/09/14 03:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so, which reads RSSI
and writes value to struct dtv_frontend_properties. That it is, in my
understanding. Same for all those DVBv5 stats. Mauro knows better as he
designed that
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so, which reads RSSI
and writes value to struct dtv_frontend_properties. That it is, in my
Em Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:51:05 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com escreveu:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so,
On 09/06/2014 05:54 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:51:05 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com escreveu:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Moro!
On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
Start
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:10:01 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
On 09/06/2014 05:54 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Fri, 5 Sep 2014 23:51:05 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com escreveu:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi
On 09/06/2014 06:17 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:10:01 +0300
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
... I simply don't understand why you want hook that RF strength call
via demod? The frontend cache is shared between demod and tuner. We use
it for tuner driver as
moikka,
Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so, which reads RSSI
and writes value to struct dtv_frontend_properties. That it is, in my
understanding. Same for all those DVBv5 stats. Mauro knows better as he
designed that functionality.
I understand that RSSI property should
moikka,
thanks for the comment.
I have feeling DVBv5 API is aimed to transfer data via property cached.
I haven't done much driver for DVBv5 statistics, but recently I
implemented CNR (DVBv5 stats) to Si2168 driver and it just writes all
the values directly to property cache. I expect RF
moikka!
On 08/28/2014 12:07 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
moikka,
thanks for the comment.
I have feeling DVBv5 API is aimed to transfer data via property cached.
I haven't done much driver for DVBv5 statistics, but recently I
implemented CNR (DVBv5 stats) to Si2168 driver and it just writes all
From: Akihiro Tsukada tsk...@gmail.com
fe-ops.tuner_ops.get_rf_strength() reports its result in u16,
while in DVB APIv5 it should be reported in s64 and by 0.001dBm.
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Tsukada tsk...@gmail.com
---
drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Moikka
I have feeling DVBv5 API is aimed to transfer data via property cached.
I haven't done much driver for DVBv5 statistics, but recently I
implemented CNR (DVBv5 stats) to Si2168 driver and it just writes all
the values directly to property cache. I expect RF strength (RSSI) is
just
21 matches
Mail list logo
