On 9/25/2012 4:41 PM, Prabhakar wrote:
> From: Lad, Prabhakar
>
> vpif_display relied on a 1-1 mapping of output and subdev. This is not
> necessarily the case. Separate the two. So there is a list of subdevs
> and a list of outputs. Each output refers to a subdev and has routing
> information. A
On Tue 25 September 2012 13:11:49 Prabhakar wrote:
> From: Lad, Prabhakar
>
> vpif_display relied on a 1-1 mapping of output and subdev. This is not
> necessarily the case. Separate the two. So there is a list of subdevs
> and a list of outputs. Each output refers to a subdev and has routing
> in
From: Lad, Prabhakar
vpif_display relied on a 1-1 mapping of output and subdev. This is not
necessarily the case. Separate the two. So there is a list of subdevs
and a list of outputs. Each output refers to a subdev and has routing
information. An output does not have to have a subdev.
The initi