Hi!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 03:46:05PM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:29:12AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Jacopo,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing this patch
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 06:54:50PM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > > +static
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 3:03 AM, jacopo mondi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:31:52AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:51:43PM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
>>> Hello Sam and Maxime (and other ov5640-ers :)
>>>
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:54:01AM -0700, Sam
Hey Jacobi,
Not a lot of time to respond right now, these days I’m bouncing around between
a couple jobs. I’ll be trying your and Maximes patches and responding to tech
details this weekend.
Just want to say that as long as we get the driver working I’m happy :) The
VAST majority of time put
Hello Maxime,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:29:12AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thanks for reviewing this patch
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 06:54:50PM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > > +static unsigned long ov5640_compute_sys_clk(struct ov5640_dev *sensor,
> > > +
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:31:52AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:51:43PM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > Hello Sam and Maxime (and other ov5640-ers :)
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:54:01AM -0700, Sam Bobrowicz wrote:
> > > Hello Maxime and Jacopo (and other
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 09:51:43PM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hello Sam and Maxime (and other ov5640-ers :)
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:54:01AM -0700, Sam Bobrowicz wrote:
> > Hello Maxime and Jacopo (and other ov5640-ers),
> >
> > I just submitted my version of this patch to the mailing
Hi Jacopo,
Thanks for reviewing this patch
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 06:54:50PM +0200, jacopo mondi wrote:
> > +static unsigned long ov5640_compute_sys_clk(struct ov5640_dev *sensor,
> > + u8 pll_prediv, u8 pll_mult,
> > +
Hello Sam and Maxime (and other ov5640-ers :)
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:54:01AM -0700, Sam Bobrowicz wrote:
> Hello Maxime and Jacopo (and other ov5640-ers),
>
> I just submitted my version of this patch to the mailing list as RFC.
> It is working on my MIPI platform. Please try it if you have
Hello Maxime and Jacopo (and other ov5640-ers),
I just submitted my version of this patch to the mailing list as RFC.
It is working on my MIPI platform. Please try it if you have time.
Hopefully we can merge these two into a single patch that doesn't
break any platforms.
Thanks,
Sam
Additional
Hello Maxime,
a few comments I have collected while testing the series.
Please see below.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:20:56AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The clock structure for the PCLK is quite obscure in the documentation, and
> was hardcoded through the bytes array of each and every
Hi Maxime,
I've recently found a problem around JPEG framerate, see below:
On 10/11/2018 11:20 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The clock structure for the PCLK is quite obscure in the documentation, and
> was hardcoded through the bytes array of each and every mode.
>
> This is troublesome, since we
The clock structure for the PCLK is quite obscure in the documentation, and
was hardcoded through the bytes array of each and every mode.
This is troublesome, since we cannot adjust it at runtime based on other
parameters (such as the number of bytes per pixel), and we can't support
either
12 matches
Mail list logo
