On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 01:28:50PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:40:16PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:50:40PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
This patch set fixes a reproducible crash I'm seeing on a 3.4.10
kernel. flush_kthread_worker (which is
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:50:40PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
This patch set fixes a reproducible crash I'm seeing on a 3.4.10
kernel. flush_kthread_worker (which is different from
flush_kthread_work) is initializing a kthread_work and a completion on
the stack, then queuing it and calling
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:40:16PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:50:40PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
This patch set fixes a reproducible crash I'm seeing on a 3.4.10
kernel. flush_kthread_worker (which is different from
flush_kthread_work) is initializing a kthread_work
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
kthread_worker was introduced together with concurrency managed
workqueue to serve workqueue users which need a special dedicated
worker - e.g. RT scheduling. This is minimal queue / flush / flush
all iterface on top
Hello,
kthread_worker was introduced together with concurrency managed
workqueue to serve workqueue users which need a special dedicated
worker - e.g. RT scheduling. This is minimal queue / flush / flush
all iterface on top of kthread and each provided interface matches the
workqueue counterpart
