On Saturday 15 October 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:52:04 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > What I would really want to hear from you is your opinion on
> > the architecture independent stuff. Obviously, ARM is the
> > most important consumer of the patch set, but I think
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:52:04 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Russell's going to hate me, but...
> >
> > I do know that he had substantial objections to at least earlier
> > versions of this, and he is a guy who knows of what he speaks.
> >
> > S
On Tuesday 11 October 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell's going to hate me, but...
>
> I do know that he had substantial objections to at least earlier
> versions of this, and he is a guy who knows of what he speaks.
>
> So I would want to get a nod from rmk on this work before proceeding.
>
Hello,
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 1:26 PM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 12:50 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:30 AM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/11/2011 09:17 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>> On Monday, October 10, 2011 2:08 PM Ma
Hello,
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:30 AM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 09:17 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On Monday, October 10, 2011 2:08 PM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> > During our stress tests, we encountered some problems :
> >
> > 1) Contiguous allocation lockup:
Hello,
On Monday, October 10, 2011 2:08 PM Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 03:54 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Welcome everyone again,
> >
> > Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
> > Allocator patches.
> >
> > This version provides mainly a bugfix fo
Hello,
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 12:57 AM Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:27:06 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 06 October 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
> > > Allocator patches.
> > >
> >
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:27:06 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 06 October 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
> > Allocator patches.
> >
> > This version provides mainly a bugfix for a very rare issue that might
> > hav
On 10/06/2011 03:54 PM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Welcome everyone again,
Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
Allocator patches.
This version provides mainly a bugfix for a very rare issue that might
have changed migration type of the CMA page blocks resulting
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> IMHO it would be good to merge the entire series into 3.2, since
>> the ARM portion fixes an important bug (double mapping of memory
>> ranges with conflicting attributes) that we've l
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> IMHO it would be good to merge the entire series into 3.2, since
> the ARM portion fixes an important bug (double mapping of memory
> ranges with conflicting attributes) that we've lived with for far
> too long, but it really depends on how ev
On Thursday 06 October 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
> Allocator patches.
>
> This version provides mainly a bugfix for a very rare issue that might
> have changed migration type of the CMA page blocks resulting in dropping
Welcome everyone again,
Once again I decided to post an updated version of the Contiguous Memory
Allocator patches.
This version provides mainly a bugfix for a very rare issue that might
have changed migration type of the CMA page blocks resulting in dropping
CMA features from the affected page b
13 matches
Mail list logo
