Em Tue, 14 Aug 2018 14:00:16 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 09/08/18 22:03, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:45:00 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >
> >> From: Hans Verkuil
> >>
> >> We need to serialize streamon/off with queueing new requests.
> >> These ioctls
On 09/08/18 22:03, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:45:00 +0200
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
>> From: Hans Verkuil
>>
>> We need to serialize streamon/off with queueing new requests.
>> These ioctls may trigger the cancellation of a streaming
>> operation, and that should not
Em Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:39:20 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On 08/09/2018 10:03 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:45:00 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> >
> >> From: Hans Verkuil
> >>
> >> We need to serialize streamon/off with queueing new requests.
> >> These
On 08/09/2018 10:03 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:45:00 +0200
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
>> From: Hans Verkuil
>>
>> We need to serialize streamon/off with queueing new requests.
>> These ioctls may trigger the cancellation of a streaming
>> operation, and that
Em Sat, 4 Aug 2018 14:45:00 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> From: Hans Verkuil
>
> We need to serialize streamon/off with queueing new requests.
> These ioctls may trigger the cancellation of a streaming
> operation, and that should not be mixed with queuing a new
> request at the same time.
>
From: Hans Verkuil
We need to serialize streamon/off with queueing new requests.
These ioctls may trigger the cancellation of a streaming
operation, and that should not be mixed with queuing a new
request at the same time.
Finally close() needs this lock since that too can trigger the
