Em Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:26:10 +0200 (CEST)
Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu:
> Hi Mauro
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > Em Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:26:28 +0200 (CEST)
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu:
> >
> > > ...speaking about which, we should at some point start mergi
Hi Mauro
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:26:28 +0200 (CEST)
> Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu:
>
> > ...speaking about which, we should at some point start merging the
> > soc-camera patch stack, which, however, requires some patches that are
> > curr
Em Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:35:29 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Monday 17 August 2009 08:19:51 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Monday 17 August 2009 02:49:01 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Em Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:18:20 +0200
> > >
> > > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > > > On Saturday 15 August 2009 10:5
Em Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:26:28 +0200 (CEST)
Guennadi Liakhovetski escreveu:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > The patches look fine to me. Yet, I see two merge conflict issues:
> > 1) if a latter patch needs to touch at the subdev probing sequence to fix a
> > bug, it will
On Monday 17 August 2009 08:19:51 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 17 August 2009 02:49:01 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:18:20 +0200
> >
> > Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> > > On Saturday 15 August 2009 10:59:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 August 2009 08:35:47 Hans
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The patches look fine to me. Yet, I see two merge conflict issues:
> 1) if a latter patch needs to touch at the subdev probing sequence to fix a
> bug, it will conflict with this patch, meaning that we'll have merge troubles
> on this tree and at
On Monday 17 August 2009 02:49:01 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:18:20 +0200
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
> > On Saturday 15 August 2009 10:59:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 11 August 2009 08:35:47 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > > Hi Mauro,
> > > >
> > > > Please pull fr
Em Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:18:20 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Saturday 15 August 2009 10:59:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 August 2009 08:35:47 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > Hi Mauro,
> > >
> > > Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-core2 for the
> > > following:
>
On Saturday 15 August 2009 10:59:19 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 August 2009 08:35:47 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> >
> > Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-core2 for the
> > following:
> >
> > - v4l: simplify v4l2_i2c_new_subdev and friends
> > - v4l: remov
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 08:35:47 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-core2 for the
> following:
>
> - v4l: simplify v4l2_i2c_new_subdev and friends
> - v4l: remove video_register_device_index
>
> The first patch simplifies v4l2_i2c_n
Hi Mauro,
Please pull from http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-core2 for the
following:
- v4l: simplify v4l2_i2c_new_subdev and friends
- v4l: remove video_register_device_index
The first patch simplifies v4l2_i2c_new_subdev and removes
v4l2_i2c_new_probed_subdev and v4l2_i2c_new_probed_
11 matches
Mail list logo