Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 18:18 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure if this is the correct mailing list to send this patch.
> >From the LinuxTV website, it seems that currently dvb-apps project
> has
> no owner.
>
> A new utility atsc_epg is added into the dvb-apps utility suite
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 19:20 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> If you take such an intolerant attitude against what others opinion
> might be, your words might just be deemed worthless, or should I say
> *bullshit*, by others. It is really sad that this world is never in
> shortage of people l
Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 19:46 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> Age would cure neither naivety nor stupidity. I would imagine only a
> self-important white supremacist would utter such comments in public
> against a total stranger. If you can read the Chinese above, I
> *seriously* doubt that, it's
Okay, you win. Apology to others in the list who have to endure the
garbage talk.
Regards,
Yufei Yuan
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:05 PM, hermann pitton wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 19:46 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
>> Age would cure neither naivety nor stupidity. I would imagine only a
>> se
Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 20:12 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> Okay, you win. Apology to others in the list who have to endure the
> garbage talk.
>
> Regards,
> Yufei Yuan
Sorry for abusing you for a ride out on mail footers.
Best,
Hermann
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:05 PM, hermann pitton
2009/6/18 Yufei Yuan :
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure if this is the correct mailing list to send this patch.
> From the LinuxTV website, it seems that currently dvb-apps project has
> no owner.
>
> A new utility atsc_epg is added into the dvb-apps utility suite. It
> parses PSIP information carried in OT
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Manu Abraham wrote:
> 2009/6/18 Yufei Yuan :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not sure if this is the correct mailing list to send this patch.
>> From the LinuxTV website, it seems that currently dvb-apps project has
>> no owner.
>>
>> A new utility atsc_epg is added into the dvb
Ok, I guess I violated at least coding style rule No.1, :) Will peruse
the coding style page tonight and redo the submission.
Regards,
Yufei
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Manu Abraham wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Manu Abraham wrote:
>> 2009/6/18 Yufei Yuan :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am
Okay, this one serves as a test as well. It's a trivial one to fix the
broken dvb-apps building process with gcc4.4 on kernel 2.6.30, another
way to eliminate the packed bitfield warning is to split the field,
but that is unwanted.
previous build error:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/alex/sou
This one is about the utility itself. I do apologize for the length
here as "inline" patch is preferred according to the guide and I don't
have any public online storage. Please let me know if this causes any
inconvenience.
Signed-off-by: Yufei Yuan
diff -uprN dvb-apps/util/atsc_epg/atsc_epg.c
d
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 20:39 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> This one is about the utility itself. I do apologize for the length
> here as "inline" patch is preferred according to the guide and I don't
> have any public online storage. Please let me know if this causes any
> inconvenience.
>
Thanks for your time. It's my first time to do this, so I have been
trying to follow literally on the wiki page to do it right. If you can
elaborate a bit about what is broken? Is it the patch created
incorrectly, or it is pasted incorrectly, or the style is still
problematic?
I noticed that cutti
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 19.06.2009, 20:00 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> Thanks for your time. It's my first time to do this, so I have been
> trying to follow literally on the wiki page to do it right. If you can
> elaborate a bit about what is broken? Is it the patch created
> incorrectly, or it is pas
Ok, let me first summarize what I have done in order not to waste your time
again. I used Evolution client,
used preformatted option, sent it to my other email box, forwarded it back and
saved it as text file, then
patched the original tree, so far everything looks okay. Hopefully you guys can
Am Freitag, den 19.06.2009, 21:38 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> Ok, let me first summarize what I have done in order not to waste your time
> again. I used Evolution client,
> used preformatted option, sent it to my other email box, forwarded it back
> and saved it as text file, then
> patched th
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Yufei Yuan wrote:
> Not sure how to make it look right in gmail, but the inline patch does
> not look right to my eyes. I have the patch attached behind as a
> backup.
You can attach the patch, no worries.
I have applied the patch, but the CodingStyle is not very
Thanks for the feedback. Will fix the coding style, and send in a new one
against the tip.
Regards,
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 11:30 +0400, Manu Abraham wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Yufei Yuan wrote:
> > Not sure how to make it look right in gmail, but the inline patch does
> > not look
I sent out a new patch yesterday under a different subject line, but it
looks like it did not make through it. Is this list a moderated one?
Anyway, please ignore yesterday's patch if you have not had a chance to
look at it. Please use this following patch, which is against 1283. It
contains:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 22.06.2009, 18:43 -0500 schrieb Yufei Yuan:
> I sent out a new patch yesterday under a different subject line, but it
> looks like it did not make through it. Is this list a moderated one?
>
> Anyway, please ignore yesterday's patch if you have not had a chance to
> look at
19 matches
Mail list logo
