On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 21:39:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name.
If
this were removed
Em 07-07-2011 08:33, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 21:39:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 15:52:53 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 07-07-2011 08:33, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 21:39:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans
Em 07-07-2011 11:58, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 15:52:53 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 07-07-2011 08:33, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 21:39:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans
Hi Mauro, Hans,
I am really surprised by the havoc caused by the little 2-line patch.
Let me sum up what I (don't) like in Hans' and Mauro's approaches:
Hans approach:
- extend v4l2_enum_dv_preset with fps and flags fields,
- allow enumerating presets by both index and preset code
- add
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name. If this
were removed
from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the API would be clearer.
The only
adjustment would be to use index as the preset selection key. Anyway, it
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name. If
this were removed
from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the API would be
clearer. The only
adjustment would be to use index as the preset selection key. Anyway,
it is
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name. If
this were removed
from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the API would be
clearer. The only
adjustment would be to use index
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 13:48:35 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name. If
this were removed from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the
Em 06-07-2011 09:03, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 13:48:35 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name. If
this were removed from
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 14:09:38 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 09:03, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 13:48:35 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name.
If
this were removed
from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the API would be
clearer. The only
adjustment would be to use
Em 06-07-2011 09:13, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 14:09:38 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 09:03, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 13:48:35 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name.
If
this were removed
from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the API would be
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name.
If
this were removed
from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the API would be
Em 06-07-2011 09:56, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name.
If
this were removed
from the ioctl, and fps
Em 06-07-2011 09:14, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 06-07-2011 08:31, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
Em 05-07-2011 10:20, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
I failed to see what information is provided by the presets name.
If
this were removed
from the ioctl, and fps would be added instead, the API would be
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 00:47:43 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Mauro,
On Monday 04 July 2011 18:09:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
[snip]
1) PRESET STANDARDS
== =
There are 3 specs involved with DV presets: ITU-R BT 709 and BT 1120 and
CEA 861.
At ITU-R
On Monday, July 04, 2011 18:09:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 29-06-2011 09:51, Tomasz Stanislawski escreveu:
The 1080p59_94 is supported by latest Samsung SoC.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Em 05-07-2011 04:26, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Monday, July 04, 2011 18:09:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 29-06-2011 09:51, Tomasz Stanislawski escreveu:
The 1080p59_94 is supported by latest Samsung SoC.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 14:08:03 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 05-07-2011 04:26, Hans Verkuil escreveu:
On Monday, July 04, 2011 18:09:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 29-06-2011 09:51, Tomasz Stanislawski escreveu:
The 1080p59_94 is supported by latest Samsung SoC.
Signed-off-by:
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I can work on the proposal this week for that. The only reason the fps
hasn't been added
yet is that I never had the time to do the research on how to represent
the fps reliably
for all CEA/VESA formats. Hmm, pixelclock / total_framesize should
always work,
Em 05-07-2011 16:02, Andy Walls escreveu:
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I can work on the proposal this week for that. The only reason the fps
hasn't been added
yet is that I never had the time to do the research on how to represent
the fps reliably
for all CEA/VESA formats. Hmm,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com wrote:
Em 05-07-2011 16:02, Andy Walls escreveu:
Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I can work on the proposal this week for that. The only reason the
fps
hasn't been added
yet is that I never had the time to do the research on how to
represent
Em 29-06-2011 09:51, Tomasz Stanislawski escreveu:
The 1080p59_94 is supported by latest Samsung SoC.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanisl...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl
---
Hi Mauro,
On Monday 04 July 2011 18:09:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
[snip]
1) PRESET STANDARDS
== =
There are 3 specs involved with DV presets: ITU-R BT 709 and BT 1120 and
CEA 861.
At ITU-R BT.709, both 60Hz and 60/1.001 Hz are equally called as 60 Hz.
BT.1120
Em 04-07-2011 19:47, Laurent Pinchart escreveu:
Hi Mauro,
On Monday 04 July 2011 18:09:18 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
[snip]
1) PRESET STANDARDS
== =
There are 3 specs involved with DV presets: ITU-R BT 709 and BT 1120 and
CEA 861.
At ITU-R BT.709, both 60Hz and
27 matches
Mail list logo
